AI Rate Professor

Sustainable Technologies

Victoria Charles

RRM1RRM2 · SST901 · ENVIRON402 · BUS7D · RRM1 · SST902 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

and networking; do not expect tight lectures or rigorous grading.

Best fit · Easy A HunterSustainability mentorEasy A possibleGuest-speaker heavyLax structureCareer networking
  • Warm, passionate sustainability advocate who opens career doors
  • Many students earn high grades while learning little structure-wise
  • and less transferable than in person

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

91/100

Multiple students report A or A+ with light effort and generous 100% grading on incomplete work.

Online and .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Content is entry-level and relaxed, though a .

Online students especially stress low difficulty; .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

; others require it but overall tone is flexible.

; in-person varies by section.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

, and ease, with caveats about structure and learning depth.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Students describe near-automatic high marks even when effort is minimal.

Format shift

Online quote of 100% grades despite low effort is especially strong.

Workload

Light

72/100

Most recent students call work easy or last-minute doable; one .

Format shift

Online BUS7D and SST sections report light work; older RRM1 was heavier.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Warm and inspiring presence, but lax freeform lectures and tech issues undercut learning for some.

Format shift

In-person mentoring shines; online teaching style is the weaker side.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Projects, readings, speakers, and participation dominate over traditional exams.

Format shift

Reviews rarely detail high-stakes finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person RRM and sustainability courses earn stronger praise for passion, speakers, jobs, and .

Main concern

Freeform structure and occasional outdated materials .

What students said

“She sent me a number of job postings and now Im gainfully employed in the sustainability field!!”
RRM1RRM2
“I left the class with an "A" feeling like I hadn't learned anything :(”
ENVIRON402
“ . Charles, she is very passionate about what she teaches”
BUS7D

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online sections feel guest-speaker heavy and tech-clunky, with but weak structure and limited learning for some.

Main concern

Disorganization, breakout-room overload, and low teaching structure.

What students said

“ , but I learned pretty much nothing from her teaching style.”
BUS7D
“Disorganized and sometimes irrelevant speakers. Lectures at you.”
SST901
“Very lovely professor but this class does not translate to virtual at all.”
RRM1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Course risk is low; assessment leans projects and participation rather than strict proctored exams.

Project focusedGuest lecturesLow exam pressureEasy grading

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and applied work with light academic pressure.

Projects and speakersCareer-focused tasksLight academic pressure
“Work load is fair to subjects and material covered easy to maintain.”
RRM1RRM2
“I left the class with an "A" feeling like I hadn't learned anything :(”
ENVIRON402

Online

Online reviews do not describe strict proctoring; work is assignment and speaker based and easy to finish late.

Assignments over examsGuest speakersEasy completion
“I did the work in the last few days of class and got it all done easily”
BUS7D
“graded everything I did (even when I barely tried) at 100%.”
BUS7D

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , but I learned pretty much nothing from her teaching style. I did the work in the last few days of class and got it all done easily”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 sustainability and RRM reviews, highlighting easy grades versus structure. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Career Support

85/100

“She sent me a number of job postings and now Im gainfully employed in the sustainability field!!”

📗 Easy Grades

91/100

“graded everything I did (even when I barely tried) at 100%.”

🧩 Structure Gap

40/100

“her teaching style was so lax and freeform that I struggled to grasp any takeaways from the course.”

💻 Online Friction

45/100

“Very lovely professor but this class does not translate to virtual at all.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • Super knowledgeable in her field and beyond, Professor Charles is inspiring and always beams with positivity.
  • Professor Charles is really encouraging.
  • and really makes space for students to share.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I did the work in the last few days of class and got it all done easily
  • Coming into the class with 0 interest, i walked out and graduated the RRM program.
  • Expect and a community service requirement.

Theme 3

🧭 About Course Design

  • Disorganized and sometimes irrelevant speakers.
  • Much of the posted material to read was out of date
  • lets speakers teach for her (theyre good)

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Only 15 reviews with mixed eras and several audit grades; themes repeat but sample is modest.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 55
1 out of 50

Course coverage

RRM1RRM26 reviews
BUS7D2 reviews
RRM12 reviews
SST9022 reviews
44761 review
Show 2 more courses
ENVIRON4021 review
SST9011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 3 · A 5

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 3