AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Gerry Clark

CIS51XHTML · CIS51 · CIS50 · CIS50CIS51 · CIS1132 · CIS5051 · XHTMLCSS · CIS67 · HTML1406 · CIS50AND51 · CIS4 · AAAAAA · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take Clark for CIS or web design if , and skills you can actually use.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHighly organizedClear feedbackPatient and professionalProject-based web designBeginner friendly
  • Students call him one of the and web design teachers at SMC.
  • Canvas materials, rubrics, and as meticulous.
  • Quizzes and projects reward reading and practice; many report easy As with effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Students say quizzes are easy if you study the guides and available.

Nearly all grade and ; the one online review also reports an A.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

HTML, CSS, and , though assignments can take longer than expected.

In-person and the one online review both describe structured, learnable material rather than theory-heavy CS.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but others say he is flexible about lateness if you stay quiet and keep up.

Attendance comments .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Reported would-take-again is 100 percent and recent reviews call him a standout professional who rebuilt students love of CS.

and the one online review; older mixed comments are a minority.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

, and project-based finals make grades attainable with consistent effort.

Format shift

and dropped quiz scores; online evidence is limited but positive.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Homework and projects as easy and instructions are unusually clear.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize project work; in-person 8-week blocks can feel long in class.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

, and real-world web skills dominate recent student language.

Format shift

In-person praise is deep and consistent; the online review matches the .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and clear rubrics carry substantial weight alongside relatively simple quizzes.

Format shift

versus closed-book tests only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students highlight patient teaching, , and strong professionalism.

Main concern

Long lecture blocks and a few older critiques about uneven pace or tone for quieter students.

What students said

“he is the SMC.”
CIS50AND51
“Professor Clark is very organized and detailed, which I loved; the .”
CIS67
“He is one of the .”
CIS50

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review praises organized Canvas resources, clear rubrics, and .

Main concern

Only one tagged online review, so online experience is thinly documented.

What students said

“He has the and provides tons of resources.”
AAAAAA

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes pull from practice questions and closed testing alone.

Easy quizzesStudy guidesProject finalExtra creditClear rubrics

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, homework that supports tests, and a final website project.

Study guide quizzesHomework countedFinal project websiteClosed book tests mentioned
“ so if u study u finish them in 2 min.”
CIS50
“I loved that the . only being based on the .”
CIS51
“final exam is a ”
AAAAAA

Online

Online evidence notes simple quizzes that .

Simple quizzesClear rubricsProject feedback
“ but are rewarding if you've given the text a read.”
AAAAAA

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“he is the SMC.”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews (1 online, 27 in person), highlighting organization, support, and assessment themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“He is one of the . I learned a lot and feel confident to implement the skills learned.”

📋 Organization

92/100

“the .”

📈 Grade Accessibility

86/100

“Easy to get a good grade. The review questions helps alot for the quizzes.”

❤️ Student Support

88/100

“I'm a DSPS student & he was super reasonable w/ accomodations once I explained.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • incredibly patient and committed to every student comprehending
  • knows and helpful
  • knows his stuff

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Gave 50 points at end of class semester
  • if your head is not in your a$$, you can get an A

Theme 3

🛠️

  • I had fun taking this class and learning WordPress
  • while but when ur done, u feel like u learned
  • use

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-eight reviews with strong consistency and detail, but many are older and only one is clearly online, so format coverage is uneven.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CIS5111 reviews
CIS504 reviews
CIS50AND513 reviews
AAAAAA2 reviews
CIS11321 review
Show 7 more courses
CIS41 review
CIS50511 review
CIS50CIS511 review
CIS51XHTML1 review
CIS671 review
HTML14061 review
XHTMLCSS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 5

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values