AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Phildon Huffaker

PHILOS1SCHOLARS · PHIL1 · PHILO1SCH · PHI1SCHOLARS · PHI1 · PHILO1 · PHILOS1 · PHILO2 · PHILOS2 · PHILOS20 · PHILOSOPHY1 · 90 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
82.05%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if , and write to his expectations; avoid if you need a flexible or camera-light online class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing LecturesLecture HeavyMandatory AttendanceGet Ready to ReadInspirational
  • In-person lectures are entertaining and if .
  • because tests and essays come from what he says aloud, not slides alone.
  • Online experiences are much weaker, with complaints about camera rules and condescending tone.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many students earn As by acing lecture-based notes and writing to his format, but it is not a free A and some call him a .

Nearly all ; the two online reviews do not show an easy A path.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Philosophy concepts and , though lectures make it more digestible.

; online comments focus on delivery problems rather than content ease.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Attendance is repeatedly described as mandatory and essential because quizzes and .

Online also forces participation with camera-on expectations; in-person tags and comments stress you will not pass if .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

and clarity, tempered by a minority who dislike his rigidity and style.

In-person reviews drive the high recommendation; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Clear criteria and frequent As exist, but and format-strict writing expectations .

Format shift

In-person evidence is mixed-fair; .

Workload

Moderate

46/100

, and a few high-stakes tests rather than endless busywork.

Format shift

and lecture note review; online adds rewatching long lectures.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

In person he is widely praised as , and inspirational, with only occasional complaints of dry or dogmatic delivery.

Format shift

; online teaching reviews are poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Grade usually rests on a few exams and as the main study source.

Format shift

and papers; online assessment details are sparse.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Most students call lectures fascinating, clear, and life-changing when they attend and .

Main concern

and and papers.

What students said

“Prof. Huffaker's lectures were an entertaining, fascinating overview of the history of the field of philosophy.”
PHILOS1SCHOLARS
“Professor Huffaker is one of the . He is so passionate about Philosophy that you can't help but be interested in the subject.”
PHIL1
“Huffaker is a great professor who makes the and easy to digest.”
PHILOS20

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Both online reviews are strongly negative, citing , and patronizing comments.

Main concern

Camera-on participation pressure and a tone students read as condescending.

What students said

“he only wants you to copy what he says word for word. if you are not in every single class with camera on he hates you.”
PHILOS20
“Just Bad. "The problem with your generation......" I'm not really fond of a professor patronizing younger students every lecture.”
PHILO2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and essays mostly , so they reward attendance and careful notes more than pure memorization tricks.

Lecture-based examsOpen note testsIn-class essaysSome take-home essaysStudy guides

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person, students report open-note tests, written essay exams, and .

Open note testsIn-class essaysTake-home essaysLecture-based quizzes
“He does a lot of .”
PHI1
“His class consists of . and the rest are in class.”
PHILO1SCH
“ exam, and an in-class essay final determine your grade.”
PHIL1

Online

Online reviews do not clearly describe exam format beyond strict participation and .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I took this class in 2021 and immediately became a philosophy major. Prof. Huffaker's lectures were an entertaining, fascinating overview of the history of the field of philosophy.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, , and attendance pressure. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Lecture Magic

86/100

“He is so passionate about Philosophy that you can't help but be interested in the subject. His lectures really stuck with me.”

📝 Notes Are Everything

70/100

“Takes notes from the lectures!!! If you copy the slideshow notes you will ace the class.”

🚪

18/100

“Show up to class!! Lectures are helpful because the text is almost always .”

👍

80/100

“ !!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are very entertaining
  • colorful metaphors and anecdotes to connect you to Socratic thinkings
  • , and has a very precise way of lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • as long as you basically repeat what he said in class, you will get an 'A.'
  • Huffaker definitely makes you work for your grade
  • but if

Theme 3

❤️ About Care and Access

  • Super caring and wants you to do well
  • Going to his office hours really helps
  • He genuinely cares about his students and is always there to help

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

90

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews spanning many years show strong consistency on lecture-first learning and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 561
4 out of 517
3 out of 55
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

PHIL113 reviews
PHILO29 reviews
PHILOS17 reviews
PHILO15 reviews
PHILOS24 reviews
Show 7 more courses
PHILOS203 reviews
PHI12 reviews
PHILOS1SCHOLARS2 reviews
PHILOSOPHY12 reviews
29261 review
PHI1SCHOLARS1 review
PHILO1SCH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

42 reported outcomes

A range

27

A+ 4 · A 21 · A- 2

B range

11

B+ 6 · B 5

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1