AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Victor Trippetti

ACCTG1 · ACCOUNTING1AND2 · ACCTG2 · ECON1 · ACC2 · SPR151007 · ACCT2 · ACCOUNTING1 · ACCT1 · ACCOUNTING2 · 104 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
76.92%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you will attend every class and study for tests; skip if you need a soft beginner cushion or cannot handle blunt sarcasm.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHilarious accountantTest-heavy examsStudy guide goldAttendance strictIndustry stories
  • Most students , and use study guides succeed and call him a gem.
  • ; cheat sheets or study guides often match the tests.
  • many love the sarcasm, some call him condescending or mean.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

A is reachable with , and , but it is not free; exams dominate the grade.

In person dominates the evidence; online .

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

Accounting concepts need practice and memorization of statements; lectures help but .

Both formats describe real accounting work; online sample is too small to reverse that.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Repeated skip-class-you-wont-pass tags and .

In person is clearly mandatory; online also stresses not missing class when meetings exist.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

High would-take-again energy from students who engage; still enough harsh avoid reviews .

Recommendation is mostly from in-person ACCTG 1/2; online is mixed but tiny.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

66/100

, and clear criteria; others say tough and unwilling on .

Format shift

In and tough grader depending on semester.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

, but , and lectures keep overall effort solid.

Format shift

In ; online sample agrees exams matter most.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

, and humor win most students; minority cite condescension and textbook reading.

Format shift

In person is where humor and stories shine; online has both gem and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Three midterms and a and occasional in-class work.

Format shift

Consistent across formats in comments that mention structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and test heavy with jokes, study guides, and ; rewards effort but punishes absences.

Main concern

, and occasional rude or favoritism complaints.

What students said

“Prof. Trippetti is truly a gem! Don't let all the negative reviews about him scare you.”
ACCOUNTING1
“ . His lectures don't make a lot of sense, gives a lot of homework, and .”
ACCOUNTING1
“He does give out study guides and allows cheat sheet.”
ACCOUNTING1

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Sparse and caring support for ACCTG 1/2, with grade driven by exams.

Main concern

Low sample and and confusing examples.

What students said

“ .”
ACCOUNTING2
“ , and teaches concepts well.”
ACCOUNTING1AND2
“This professor has been one of the . He tends to read straight out of the book.”
ACCOUNTING1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are the core; study guides often mirror tests and some terms allow a cheat sheet, but .

Study guidesCheat sheet allowedThree exams plus finalNon-cumulative final sometimes

Assessment risk

Standard

64/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams are long and serious but well supported by study guides, practice, and .

Study guide equals testCheat sheetWeekly homeworkStrict attendance before exams
“He does give out study guides and allows cheat sheet.”
ACCOUNTING1
“gives amazing study guides that are identical to the tests.”
ACCOUNTING2

Online

Limited online comments still describe exam-centered grades with fair tests when prepared.

Exam-centered gradeFair testsHomework online
“Class is mostly centered around your 4 exam grades, so make sure to do well on those.”
ACCOUNTING2
“ .”
ACCOUNTING1AND2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Simply put, Trippetti was the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting exam-centered accounting success versus personality and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“He makes everything easy. Gives tons of practice for you to get comfortable with the material.”

📝

64/100

“The class grade is mostly based on the 3 tests and final, so be very prepared for those”

😄 Personality Split

55/100

“Nasty, mean attitude. He goes on several tangents every class”

👍

78/100

“If you go to class, pay attention, do the homeworks and actually try to understand the material you will get an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is hilarious, makes jokes in class all the time
  • He was CFO for LAgear so he gives a lot of personal business insight.
  • He reads straight out the book and gives side notes which are keynotes

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • accounting was never as easy as when I took it with him
  • Not an easy A you guys gotta work.
  • You definitely need to work to get an A.

Theme 3

🚪

  • you can only have 3 absences and if you miss a class it would be impossible to catch up
  • DO NOT miss a class.
  • Make sure not to miss class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

104

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews with , and consistent exam-plus-attendance themes despite personality splits.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 579
4 out of 58
3 out of 56
2 out of 52
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ACCOUNTING126 reviews
ACCOUNTING25 reviews
ACCT15 reviews
ACCT24 reviews
ACCTG23 reviews
Show 5 more courses
ACC22 reviews
ACCOUNTING1AND22 reviews
ACCTG11 review
ECON11 review
SPR1510071 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

42 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 4 · A 19 · A- 1

B range

9

B+ 3 · B 6

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1