AI Rate Professor

Business

Julie Kim

ACCTSECT · ACCTG2 · ACCT1014 · ACCT2 · ACCTG4005 · ACCTG9 · ACCT12 · ACCTG10B · ACCT9 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

, and expect fair grades.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear grading criteriaOnline savvyCaring and responsiveOrganized structurePrompt grading
  • Extremely high praise for , and and in person.
  • Workload is manageable if you stay on deadlines; so .
  • 100% would take again among those who answered; multiple easy-A and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Many As reported; , and discussions on time and and often straightforward.

Online ethics and accounting reviews emphasize easy quizzes and ; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Material is standard accounting difficulty but well scaffolded with notes, videos, and .

Both formats describe manageable difficulty; .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

; participation is mainly discussion posts when required.

Online lean optional; a , so overall flexible especially online.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Would-take-again is 100% with and care.

Strong recommendation holds across online and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Clear criteria, fair grading, and willingness to .

Format shift

Leniency and fairness appear in both online and in-person comments.

Workload

Light

68/100

Homework and quizzes are straightforward; long chapters are the main time sink, not busywork overload.

Format shift

Online notes longer Connect reading; overall still light-to-moderate.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Clear instructions, chapter notes, extra videos, prompt responses, and proactive care define the experience.

Format shift

Online students highlight structure; in-person students highlight accessibility and kindness.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

HW, quizzes, discussions, and projects dominate; exams exist but are not described as the sole driver.

Format shift

Online ethics especially graded by few things plus discussions; and final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person and older mixed-format comments still , and able to rescue struggling students.

Main concern

Some older classes split instructors or .

What students said

“Professor Kim's kindness and consideration saved me from ending the course with a C- or D into securing a B”
ACCT2
“Professor Kim is fair and straightforward. Do your work, study and you will get the grade you deserve”
ACCT1014
“easy A”
ACCT12

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online accounting and ethics courses are well structured with , and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ and ”
ACCTG10B
“The and Prof. and caring”
ACCTG2
“ , and there are discussions that you need to participate”
ACCT9

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and projects with study guides; reviews do not clearly prove harsh proctoring.

Straightforward quizzesStudy guides for midterm and finalDiscussions and projectsClear grading criteria

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

study guides for midterm and final; ; proctoring tools not clearly described.

Study guidesMidterm and finalFair grading
“Gave invaluable study guies for both the mid-term and final”
ACCTG4005

Online

; no webcam or Lockdown Browser mentioned.

Easy quizzesDiscussion participationMcGraw-Hill Connect
“ , and there are discussions that you need to participate”
ACCT9
“Her HW and ”
ACCTG2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I took her ACCTG2 in Spring 2021 online. The and Prof. and caring... !”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews (5 online, 9 in person), highlighting organization and care. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“ and . She also provides notes for each chapter which is really helpful”

👍

95/100

“I am done with taking accounting classes, but I'd love to taker her again!”

❤️ Caring Support

88/100

“Professor Kim's kindness and consideration saved me from ending the course with a C- or D into securing a B”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The
  • provides extra videos to watch
  • Professor is very knowledgable

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy A

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • so
  • class is just thru McGraw-Hill Connect
  • well structured than other classes I took on-line before

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

14 reviews with strong consistency on organization, fairness, and recommendation across years and formats.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACCT23 reviews
ACCTG23 reviews
ACCTG92 reviews
ACCT10141 review
ACCT121 review
Show 4 more courses
ACCT91 review
ACCTG10B1 review
ACCTG40051 review
ACCTSECT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values