AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Reuben Jacobs

Courses not reported · 0 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
0.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
0.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are fully self-directed and and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear expectationsDisorganizedHarsh or inconsistent gradingUnhelpful and reactiveMandatory attendance feel
  • Comments cite , and disorganization.
  • as harsh or inconsistent, with zeros and .
  • One review notes an easy A , but most report difficulty and frustration.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

Most students report harsh or and low grades, though one case got an A due to ungraded work.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Students say he expects you to know everything, offers little help, and lectures are .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Multiple reviews say attendance was mandatory despite limited teaching value reported.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Reviews consistently say , and negative interactions.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students report zeros given easily and grading.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload mention is limited, but frequent zeros and assignment confusion suggest moderate tasks with .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Comments highlight disorganization, unclear expectations, minimal help, and reactive behavior.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mentions of lectures and and exams or graded tasks.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

No evidence of ; format seems standard with regular assignments and lectures.

Lecture HeavyStandard Proctoring ImpliedAssignments Focus

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ it was graded.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, clustering recurring , and demeanor; Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“Awful, not communitive, disorganize hard to understand.”

⚖️

15/100

“He also heavily impacts your grades, you will get 0's easily.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

10/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Not communitive, disorganize hard to understand.
  • Professor Jacobs will not help students and expect you to know everything.
  • Lecture heavy and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He also heavily impacts your grades, you will get 0's easily.
  • Grade poorly.
  • Got an A because 70% of .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Mr Jacobs has a tendency to overreact to students negatively.
  • Gets mad and .
  • Do not message him questions, hates it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

0

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews over two years with consistent negativity but limited detail and .

Inside 0 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values