AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Christina Sundermeier

COUNS12 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

some students love her counseling class, others flatly reject it with .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPolarized ReviewsEasy Career CounselingKind SupportMandatory AttendanceLight Homework
  • Only four reviews split evenly between glowing easy-A praise and .
  • Positive , and self-reflection in COUNS12.
  • Negative reviews give and do not waste time.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

Positive students report easy As with applied reflection, but half the sample is hostile and grade data is thin.

Online and ; two terse in-person reviews give no grade detail.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Counseling content and .

Detailed ease comments come from online and one in-person dual-enrollment student.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Multiple reviews mark attendance mandatory with little flexibility noted.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Exactly split take-again signals leave recommendation highly student-dependent.

Online and ; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Positive reviews say grades track application and self-reflection; .

Format shift

Only the detailed .

Workload

Light

70/100

Students who , and discussion boards.

Format shift

Online explicitly says not a lot of homework; .

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Praise for kindness and interesting lectures is canceled by two total-rejection reviews.

Format shift

Online is highly positive; in-person is split extreme high and extreme low.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and application tasks rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews split between easy-A high-school dual-enrollment praise and .

Main concern

Two of constructive detail.

What students said

“easy A class. Christina is very easy to talk to and .”
COUNS12
“ ”
COUNS12
“Don't waste your time”
COUNS12

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

One online review calls her understanding with interesting lectures and .

Main concern

Single-review sample cannot confirm consistency.

What students said

“She is such a .”
COUNS12

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; assessment seems assignment and reflection based.

JournalsDiscussion BoardsSelf ReflectionNo Exam Detail

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person positives describe journals and discussion boards; negatives omit assessment details entirely.

JournalsDiscussion BoardsSelf Reflection
“we have journals and discussion boards. ”
COUNS12

Online

Online comment mentions lectures and .

Light HomeworkLectures
“There is not a lot of .”
COUNS12

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“easy A class. Christina is very easy to talk to and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting polarized praise versus bare rejections. Credibility rating: Low.

👍 Supportive Side

70/100

“she's a great career counselor.”

⚠️

50/100

“ ”

📝 Light Workload

70/100

“There is not a lot of .”

Theme 1

💚 About Support

  • Christina is very easy to talk to and .
  • understands that some students have anxiety.

Theme 2

⛔

  • Don't waste your time

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only four polarized reviews with two one-line negatives sharply limit reliability of any strong claim.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

COUNS124 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1