AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mohammad Rahnavard

MATH54 · MATH81 · MATH85 · MATH20 · MATH2 · MATH84 · MATH31 · MATH26 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
26.67%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Avoid unless you are already strong in math and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard accentBoard lecture onlySelf-study requiredTough graderBoring lectures
  • Most students struggle to understand his accent and board-facing delivery.
  • Success usually requires teaching yourself from the book and online resources.
  • Homework and tests dominate; organization and engagement are frequent complaints.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

A few strong self-teachers report easy As, but .

Both formats require self-study; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Material feels harder because and pace or backlog is common.

Online students stress unfinished syllabi and speed; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

, yet students say lectures add little beyond the book.

Both formats often mark attendance mandatory despite limited lecture value.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

27/100

and comment tone are largely negative due to teaching and communication issues.

Online ; in-person has a small minority of conditional yeses.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and unclear-criteria complaints outweigh occasional fair or .

Format shift

; in-person notes include curves after mass failure.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of and require independent practice.

Format shift

and test-heavy assessment.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Accent, board talk, boring delivery, and weak answers dominate student experience.

Format shift

Negative teaching comments appear in both online and in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Homework and exams carry nearly all weight; participation is secondary.

Format shift

Online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In person, many call lectures boring and ; a minority say diligent students who self-study can still pass.

Main concern

Accent, low volume, board-facing teaching, and harsh or .

What students said

“He has a heavy accent we could barely understand him, he speaks very low and talks only to the board.”
MATH54
“ !!”
MATH26
“You end up teaching yourself from the book.”
MATH20

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report fast , and a need to relearn everything externally.

Main concern

Pace, accent, and .

What students said

“his lectures are very fast and the powerpoint.”
MATH26
“He grades the and barely helps you understand the material.”
MATH20
“ so you'd have to know the material by heart to ace them.”
MATH2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often described as hard, picky, or .

Test heavyUnclear criteriaHomework not always alignedTough grader

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Tests can be fair for prepared students but and .

Test heavyTough gradingBonus points sometimesSelf-study needed
“He and if you don't check your work”
MATH26
“our whole class failed every test he gave so ”
MATH26

Online

Students report and ; proctoring tools are not clearly described.

Unclear exam criteriaBeyond homeworkTough grader
“He grades the and barely helps you understand the material.”
MATH20
“ so you'd have to know the material by heart to ace them.”
MATH2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !! All he does is talk to the board when he teaches, his accent is super hard to understand and his handwriting is terrible”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, emphasizing communication and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Clarity

24/100

“He has a heavy accent we could barely understand him, he speaks very low and talks only to the board.”

📚

30/100

“You end up teaching yourself from the book.”

📉 Recommendation

27/100

“ !!”

🧪

32/100

“He and if you don't check your work”

Theme 1

🗣️ About Communication

  • his accent is super hard to understand
  • talks only to the board
  • I can't barely understand him when he spoke

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He
  • If you study and you need an A he would be the one

Theme 3

😴 About Engagement

  • hands down the absolute most boring class
  • Everyone in his class is sleeping.
  • Really boring professor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

26 reviews over many years with highly consistent complaints about accent, delivery, and .

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 56
2 out of 54
1 out of 513

Course coverage

MATH208 reviews
MATH264 reviews
MATH313 reviews
MATH813 reviews
MATH853 reviews
Show 3 more courses
MATH22 reviews
MATH842 reviews
MATH541 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1