AI Rate Professor

Design Technology

Jan Nagel

ANIM75 · ENTERTAINMENT7 · ET72 · ETET · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Avoid unless required; only consider if , and need strong written feedback.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderUnclear ExpectationsRude AttitudeOutdated MaterialsHigh Standards
  • , and poorly explained.
  • Tone is often described as sarcastic, unencouraging, or .
  • Content can feel outdated or boring; a minority of older reviews still learned a lot.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Even solid effort can get marked down; and .

Online includes D and F reports plus tough-grader tags; if directions are followed.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is often called not hard but boring or outdated, with and writing rather than deep intellectual load.

Online ANIM75 is called not hard but useless; ET72 online and in and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and warn that skipping hurts your chance to pass.

Online and in-person ET72 both report mandatory attendance in several comments.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

repeated worst-class and rude-attitude language.

; a few older reviews are more mixed or positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

and stories of doing the work yet getting .

Format shift

Online and ; one older online student still liked the high bar.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Students report lots of reading and writing with strict deadlines and frequent feedback comments.

Format shift

Online ET72 stresses never leave work to the last days; .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

and high standards, but many say she is rude, unencouraging, and unclear.

Format shift

Recent online reviews are sharply negative; .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of assignments, quizzes, and exams with heavy writing and instruction-following pressure.

Format shift

; in-person mentions exams with odd questions and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person and older and slow grading.

Main concern

Rude or and .

What students said

“Very rude,always has an attitude”
ET72
“Rude and inconsistent with grading. Will do what is asked and still get marked down.”
ET72
“If you follow her directions and keep up with .”
ETET

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections draw the harshest reviews for , and conflict-heavy discussion management.

Main concern

and demoralizing tone make online work feel useless or high-risk.

What students said

“ . . Shes also extremely sarcastic and unencouraging.”
ET72
“I feel as if this class was useless, though .”
ANIM75
“I absolutely loved this professor even thought she .”
ET72

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and exams appear ordinary but poorly explained, with little evidence of student-friendly open formats.

Unclear QuizzesWriting HeavyInstruction Dependent

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and but do not clearly prove proctoring style.

ExamsHomework FeedbackUnclear Criteria
“on one of answer, kindda of weird.”
ET72
“the teacher so you're not sure where you are at with your work.”
ET72

Online

Online students say quizzes make no sense and instructions must be followed carefully; proctoring is not clearly described.

Unclear QuizzesHeavy Reading and WritingOutdated Materials
“ .”
ET72
“Make sure to NEVER leave the assignments for the last 2 days before deadline”
ET72

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Quizzes make absolutely no sense. Shes also extremely sarcastic and unencouraging. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews (6 online, 7 in and clarity. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation

18/100

“Probably the . Very rude,always has an attitude”

⚖️

25/100

“Rude and inconsistent with grading. Will do what is asked and still get marked down.”

📚 Course Value

40/100

“I feel as if this class was useless, though .”

📝 High Standards Fan

70/100

“what I loved about her is that she makes you work hard and she reads and comment on everything you do.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she always has an attitude
  • Shes also extremely sarcastic and unencouraging
  • She is good and she is thorough.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Will do what is asked and still get marked down.
  • If you follow her directions and keep up with .

Theme 3

📂 About Materials

  • The material is boring and out of date.
  • the textbooks and materials are outdated.
  • Search online for how to's

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews span 2005-2024 with , but many older brief notes and sparse grade data lower confidence.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ET728 reviews
ANIM753 reviews
ENTERTAINMENT71 review
ETET1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values