AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Gonzales Rojas

ARC30 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid unless you are already strong in architecture studio and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProLots of redesignsTough graderCritique-heavy studioDoes not teach muchHigh homework load
  • Studio is critique-centered with repeated redesign cycles
  • Students report weak teaching value and
  • Workload and participation pressure are high even when an A is possible

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible but only after heavy redesigns, participation, and .

All evidence is in-person Arc30.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Unrealistic redesign demands and low instructional support make the studio intellectually and practically hard.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

38/100

as optional in one review but grade-cutting and .

All evidence is in-person; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Two strongly negative reviews outweigh one reluctant yes after considering leaving architecture.

Recommendation signals come only from in-person Arc30.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students repeatedly tag tough grading and say good grades require sitting through annoying critiques and constant rework.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Overwhelming

16/100

Massive homework and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Comments say critiques give little useful teaching and leave weaker students underserved.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Studio , and redo cycles rather than exams.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All three Arc30 reviews describe heavy project rework, weak instruction, and demoralizing critiques despite occasional accessibility or .

Main concern

Students say they learn little from him and .

What students said

“I learned from myself due to massive amounts of hw.”
Arc30
“Does not teach and actually was when you do come every class is a critique”
Arc30
“I genuinely considered dropping architecture as a whole because of him this semester.”
Arc30

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is studio critique and project based; reviews do not describe traditional proctored exams.

Design critiquesProject redesignsJury review

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Final evaluation is critique and jury style with .

In-class critiquesProject redesignsFinal jurors
“Every class a .”
Arc30
“The jurors for and .”
Arc30

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I genuinely considered dropping architecture as a whole because of him this semester.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person Arc30 reviews focused on critiques, rework, and low teaching value. Credibility rating: Low.

🚧 Teaching Value

24/100

“Childish professor who's quality of work is not there and will teach you nothing.”

🔁 Redesign Workload

16/100

“Will have you redesigning your projects 2-4x!”

⚖️

22/100

“This Professor will only give you a good grade if you sit through his annoying critiques”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Does not teach and actually was when you do come every class is a critique
  • he puts in noticeably less effort and time with students who need the most help
  • I learned from myself due to massive amounts of hw.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • .
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Studio Culture

  • he will make
  • The jurors for and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three recent same-course reviews, highly negative and consistent, but the sample is too small for high confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

Arc303 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values