AI Rate Professor

Art

Tia Santana

DESIGN1 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you have no other option; the sole review paints a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderPoor communicationNitpicky feedbackHeavy workloadDisengaging classes
  • Only one review exists and it is strongly negative
  • Classes feel long, nonengaging, and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Tough, nitpicky grading with and effort-heavy.

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Difficulty is rated high with lots of homework and .

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as .

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

The and would not encourage retaking.

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

and described as nitpicky with .

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of heavy.

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Classes called long and nonengaging with poor email responsiveness.

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Homework and .

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single in-person design review describes , and .

Main concern

and weak communication.

What students said

“awful professor. long and nonengaging classes. so very hard to communicate with. very nitpicky with the guessing why you got a low grade”
design-1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format; .

Project gradingParticipation matters

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; and project feedback.

Nitpicky gradingLittle feedback
“very nitpicky with the guessing why you got a low grade”
design-1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“awful professor. long and nonengaging classes. so very hard to communicate with.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting poor communication and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“long and nonengaging classes”

📧 Communication

10/100

“ so very hard to communicate with”

⚖️

12/100

“very nitpicky with the guessing why you got a low grade”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • long and nonengaging classes

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • very nitpicky with the grading
  • Lots of homework

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one review exists, so scores reflect a single strong negative account with limited corroboration.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

design-11 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values