AI Rate Professor

Social Science

Soo Kim

SOCIOL1 · WGS1O · WGS10 · SOC1 · SOCIO1 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
31.25%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid unless and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProNo LecturesHeavy ReadingLate GradingCondescendingExtra Credit
  • Most students report no real lectures and .
  • Grades and the term.
  • A minority who finish all work and EC can still earn an A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

, and EC can yield an A, but many still struggle without guidance.

All evidence is from Online reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Dense readings, little instruction, and .

All evidence is from Online reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Attendance is listed mandatory in some sections and .

All evidence is from Online reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Roughly one in ; most warn of no teaching and hostile or unhelpful tone.

All evidence is from Online reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Tough-grader and help some students land an A.

Format shift

All evidence is from Online reviews only.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Heavy weekly reading, discussions, papers, and .

Format shift

All evidence is from Online reviews only.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Majority , and condescension; a few find her caring one-on-one.

Format shift

All evidence is from Online reviews only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Weekly discussions, writing, and reading quizzes dominate; midterms and finals also appear.

Format shift

All evidence is from Online reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Fully online SOCIOL/WGS sections with , and writing; many call it like having no professor.

Main concern

No guidance, late or missing grades, and dismissive tone toward students.

What students said

“There are and the student is expected to read, interpret, and .”
SOC1
“she doesnt grade ANYTHING until the end, so the whole time you dont know your grade.”
SOCIOL1
“As long as you complete the ... She also has a lot of EC so it was an easy A.”
SOCIOL1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often described as tricky or poorly worded with little lecture prep.

Midterm and FinalPoorly Worded TestsTrick Questions

Assessment risk

Strict

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Students report midterms and finals plus poorly worded or .

Midterm and FinalPoorly Worded TestsLate Grades
“ .”
WGS10
“A lot of , and only mid term and final.”
SOCIO1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It is like having no professor, just receiving a list of chapters to read. !”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 Online reviews, , and polarized grade outcomes. Credibility rating: High.

📚

28/100

“There are and the student is expected to read, interpret, and .”

📉 Recommendation Risk

28/100

“ ”

⏳ Grade Blackout

30/100

“she doesnt grade ANYTHING until the end, so the whole time you dont know your grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and refused to give personalized feedback
  • check the syllabus every time you have a question
  • It is like having no professor, just receiving a list of chapters to read

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She also has a lot of EC so it was an easy A
  • Kinda a lot of reading though but it was manageable
  • If you put effort into those you'll get an A

Theme 3

💔 About Tone & Support

  • level of condescension, shameless in this current social climate
  • Unwilling to work with students to the extreme
  • Seems more interested in her PhD than actually encouraging students success

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen detailed Online reviews from 2020-2023 show consistent themes of , and weak teaching support.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 511

Course coverage

SOCIOL17 reviews
SOC14 reviews
WGS103 reviews
SOCIO11 review
WGS1O1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 3