AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Camille Diaz

N5L · N3L · N35 · N35L · NURS5L · N5 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

if you can stay highly prepared under pressure; many students find the clinical experience harsh.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough Clinical GraderHigh StandardsPolarizing InstructorHeavy PaperworkPrepares Safe Nurses
  • Reviews are sharply split between life-changing clinical mentor and
  • Expect high preparation, rationales, and detailed paperwork in clinical settings
  • ; risky if you need a supportive low-stress clinical

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

24/100

Even supporters describe high standards; critics say she looks for reasons to fail and grades very tough.

; the one online review is positive but not grade-easy.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Nursing clinical with constant questioning, patho grilling, and heavy documentation makes the experience demanding.

Difficulty is .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Every review lists attendance as .

and all in-person clinical reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

About half call her the ; the other half urge avoidance as unfair or intimidating.

In-person reviews drive the split; the sole .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

and stories of write-ups, statements of concern, and extremely high standards dominate.

Format shift

; online sample does not discuss harsh grades.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students report heavy paperwork, data collection, and prep that can crowd out study and patient care time.

Format shift

Workload complaints are concentrated in in-person N5 and N5L reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

supporters praise knowledge, rationales, and feedback; critics say she teaches by fear and excess busywork.

Format shift

In-person is deeply split; one online review is fully positive.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and paperwork all matter, not a single exam type.

Format shift

Assessment style is described mainly for in-person clinicals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person clinical reviews split between outstanding teaching with and claims of bullying, fear, and excessive paperwork.

Main concern

If you land on her bad side, students say the environment becomes stressful and failure-focused.

What students said

“Professor Diaz is an AMAZING clinical instructor. I cannot say enough about her.”
N5L
“Seems like she is out to fail you all the time”
N5
“The environment is not conducive to learning, she instill fear and .”
N5L

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One online clinical review is strongly positive, praising knowledge, confidence-building, and feedback.

Main concern

Single online sample cannot balance the .

What students said

“Professor Diaz is the . She thought me a lot.”
N3L

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Evaluation feels like high-pressure clinical interrogation and documentation rather than student-friendly exams.

Clinical grillingPathophysiology questionsStatements of concernDetailed paperwork

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person clinicals feature constant readiness checks, patho grilling, and heavy documentation standards.

Never say I don't knowPathophysiology grillingStatements of concernExtra paperwork
“Always be ready for anything; this professor expects you to be ready 100%. "Never say I, don't know"”
N5L
“The instructor on site grills heavily on pathophysiology and hands out statements of concerns like candy.”
N5L
“Her expectations of students are to be detailed oriented, precautious, and prepared.”
NURS5L

Online

The and clinical learning, without proctoring details.

Homework feedbackClinical preparation
“She provides the feedbacks for .”
N3L

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You will spend more time focusing on .”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting polarized clinical mentorship and strict standards. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“One of the opinion.”

⚠️ Fear and Fairness

20/100

“Seems like she is out to fail you all the time”

📚 Workload and Paperwork

24/100

“She also wanted us to do way more paperwork than the other classes which made it so difficult to study for lecture.”

👍 When She Clicks

80/100

“She will teach you how to be a safe and perfect nurse.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She puts a lot of thought behind what she teaches and
  • Doesnt actually teach. Makes you look everything up.
  • her hands on skills are second to none

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Standards

  • Being in her course is almost like nursing boot camp.
  • expects you to be ready 100%

Theme 3

😬 About Clinical Climate

  • she instill fear and
  • this teacher is a bully
  • Keep your head down.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

14 detailed clinical reviews show a , so confidence in the split is solid but not one-sided.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

N5L7 reviews
N3L2 reviews
N52 reviews
N351 review
N35L1 review
Show 1 more courses
NURS5L1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

8

Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 3