AI Rate Professor

Social Science

Yanira Rivas Pineda

POLSC21 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

she knows the material, but expect tight participation control and uneven student rapport.

Best fit · Effort For RewardParticipation mattersTough graderExtra credit availablePatronizing lecturesKnowledgeable
  • one found her discouraging and easy, the other tough but .
  • Participation and reading matter; .
  • Sample is too small for strong confidence.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

One student calls it easy while and a B despite .

All evidence is in person from only two reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

One review says easy and not college-level in feel, while the other rates difficulty higher.

Conflicting in-person comments with no online sample.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

and participation is repeatedly emphasized.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

; the other found the style disengaging.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Tough grader tag and a B with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Reading and participation matter; workload is not described as extreme.

Format shift

Sparse in-person workload detail only.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Knowledgeable and not shaming, but also described as patronizing and .

Format shift

Teaching judgments are polarized and in person only.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Participation, reading, and appear, without clear exam-versus-assignment dominance.

Format shift

Limited in-person assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

knowledgeable with .

Main concern

Patronizing facilitation and .

What students said

“Easy, but painfully patronizing and disengaging approach to an engaging topic.”
POLSC21
“Extremely knowledgeable and doesn't make you feel horrible for not knowing everything.”
POLSC21

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exam format; .

Participation mattersExtra creditTough grader

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments emphasize participation and policy.

Participation mattersExtra creditTough grader
“she grades a bit tough. and remember to do the lol.”
POLSC21
“class time devoted to student participation was guided on a tight leash”
POLSC21

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy, but painfully patronizing and disengaging approach to an engaging topic.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews with opposing tones. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Extremely knowledgeable and doesn't make you feel horrible for not knowing everything.”

⚖️

38/100

“she grades a bit tough. and remember to do the lol.”

🗣️ Classroom Climate

30/100

“She was fairly discouraging of discourse, class time devoted to student participation was guided on a tight leash”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • painfully patronizing and disengaging approach to an engaging topic
  • Extremely knowledgeable and doesn't make you feel horrible for not knowing everything.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy, but painfully patronizing
  • she grades a bit tough
  • remember to do the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews from 2020 and 2023 with conflicting tones limit reliability.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

POLSC212 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values