AI Rate Professor

Life Science

Dona-Rae Richwine

NUTRITION1 · NUTR2861 · NUT01 · NUT1 · NUTRI1 · NUTR1 · NUT1230 · NUTR01 · NUT1453 · NUTRI01 · 75 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Solid GE nutrition pick if you keep up with worksheets and exams; expect fair work for an A, not a free ride.

Best fit · Effort For RewardWorksheet Driven ExamsSlides Over TextbookPassionate NutritionExtra Credit AvailableOrganization Mixed
  • Do the worksheets and slides and most students find Nutrition 1 very passable.
  • and often offers ; textbook is frequently unnecessary.
  • A recurring minority cites disorganization, picky grading, poor communication, or feeling targeted.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Many report easy A by doing worksheets, slides, and , though some say you must work and .

Both formats include easy-A reports; online short terms sometimes feel .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

and worksheets, not abstract hard science for most.

Online and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

; many online sections list attendance as not mandatory.

Online often optional; in-person more often mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Majority recommend her for passion and and grading complaints.

Older and many recent reviews recommend; a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

and dropped exams help, but several call her picky or a .

Format shift

Online and .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Weekly assignments, discussions, worksheets, and multiple exams; usually manageable if kept current.

Format shift

Some online .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Passionate, knowledgeable lectures and helpful worksheets for most; minority cites disorganization and poor communication.

Format shift

In-person often more inspirational; online quality more mixed on communication.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

, and a larger project; worksheets prepare tests.

Format shift

; online stresses timed long exams more often.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Many praise engaging lectures, passion, food demos, and and worksheets; some say tests are odd or .

Main concern

, and occasional unprofessional or power-trip reports.

What students said

“She is amazing! and assignments”
NUT1
“ .”
NUTRITION1
“ ”
NUT1

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Often described as easy if you watch lectures, do worksheets, and complete weekly work; .

Main concern

, and inconsistent email response.

What students said

“Was almost a joke class because it was so easy.”
NUT1
“if you follow her instructions you'll get an A!”
NUTR1
“gives ALOT of ”
NUT1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are central and ; success comes from slides and worksheets, not flashy open-book claims.

Multiple examsDropped lowest examWorksheet-based studySlides cover testsExtra credit

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and worksheets; ; some find portion-size or image questions confusing.

Exams from slides and worksheetsDropped lowest examExtra creditStudy guides
“ if you payed attention in class and did the short worksheet for the chapter.”
NUT1
“ .”
NUTRITION1
“ something like a portion sizes based off a flat image?”
NUT1

Online

Online sections , and worksheets for study; proctoring details are not clearly proven.

4 exams plus finalWeekly assignmentsWorksheets for studyTimed exams reported
“4 exams 50 questions each plus a 60 question final”
NUT1
“ and baerly enough time to finish them”
NUT1
“The but if you read the powerpoints and the lectures you should be okay.”
NUTR1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You do NOT need the textbook, her slides are all you need for the tests and assignments. Only bad thing . Easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 Nutrition reviews across online and and dissent. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Her lectures are amazing. She knows her stuff and is very skilled at making things interesting”

📈 Path To An A

76/100

“ and you'll pass. ”

📝

58/100

“PLEASE DO THE WORKSHEETS, 4 exams 50 questions each plus a 60 question final.”

⚠️ Mixed Organization

50/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • contagious passion for nutrition
  • She even brings healthy homemade food to class
  • and knows her stuff

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A
  • you just have to put in the work
  • an A is an 89.5% & up

Theme 3

⚠️ About Frustrations

  • She communicates with you but half the time it's wrong
  • !
  • she is unfair.....

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

75

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years with repeated , and mixed organization.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 540
4 out of 516
3 out of 54
2 out of 55
1 out of 510

Course coverage

NUTR123 reviews
NUT19 reviews
NUT014 reviews
NUTRITION14 reviews
NUTRI13 reviews
Show 6 more courses
NUTR012 reviews
16201 review
NUT12301 review
NUT14531 review
NUTR28611 review
NUTRI011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 4 · A 14

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Rather not say 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1