AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Eunhye Kim

ESL · ESL21A · 19B · 21A · 10W · ESL11A · ESL19B · 38 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
64.29%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you want a demanding ESL grind and will use office hours; otherwise expect stress and strict grades.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLots of PapersPassionate TeacherHeavy WorkloadPolarizing Style
  • Students who want to improve English often praise her rigor and feedback
  • Many others call grading unfair, rude, or impossible for an A
  • , and and in-person sections

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

and multiple students report failing or barely passing despite heavy effort.

Both online and ; online adds camera pressure and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

, and papers make the content feel intense for an ESL sequence.

Online and ; short terms are especially hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and warn that skipping hurts your chance to pass.

Online sections often require cameras on; pass.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

About two-thirds would take her again, but a .

Recent online reviews are mixed-positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, and claims that As are rare or impossible.

Format shift

; some online students still earned A or A+.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

So , and weekly difficult assignments appear across formats.

Format shift

Consistent heavy load online and in person.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Passionate clear feedback for motivated students versus rude, confusing, or unkind reports from others.

Format shift

Online office-hour praise is stronger; older in-person reviews attack pronunciation and respect.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and and quizzes.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person classes are lecture- and ; admirers say you learn a lot if you work, critics cite rudeness, accent issues, and unfair D or F grades.

Main concern

and reports of disrespect or .

What students said

“She is a wonderful professor even though many students consider her a , but I am sure that you will definitely learn a lot from her class.”
ESL19B
“ ”
ESL11A
“It is not possible for anybody to receive an A in this class”
ESL21A

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online sections are serious and homework-heavy; cameras are sometimes expected, office hours help, and opinions split between passionate teaching and disrespectful tone.

Main concern

, and required camera use even when college policy is flexible.

What students said

“A lot of a .”
ESL19B
“She is great teacher! Lot of work but I learn a lot.”
ESL19B
“ and do not relate to the lecture that she asked us to read!!”
21A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as hard and sometimes poorly aligned with lectures; papers carry large weight.

Hard ExamsQuizzesMany PapersCamera Expected Online

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person sections use quizzes, tests, and and low reported pass rates in some terms.

QuizzesTest HeavySo Many Papers
“She gives tons of homework and .”
21A
“SO ”
ESL11A

Online

and pressure to keep cameras on.

Hard ExamsCamera On ExpectedHeavy Written Work
“ and do not relate to the lecture that she asked us to read!!”
21A
“it's an online course but she expect everyone to have camera on .”
ESL19B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are ready to work and truly want to learn and . Expect to read.”

Voice snapshots generated from 38 reviews (11 online, 27 in person), balancing praise for rigor with fairness and tone complaints. Credibility rating: High.

🔥 Polarizing Recommendation

58/100

“ , and .”

📝 Paper and

22/100

“A lot of a .”

🎯 Learning Payoff for Workers

52/100

“So but they really deserve! and :)”

⚖️

28/100

“Please dont take her class please dont please I participate in all classes i did all but i got D she is not fair at all”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was a very passionate professor.
  • Serious but she teaches well. She asks a lot but I learned a lot.
  • Her class is like a desert, dry and unhappy.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Still gave me an A even though I only got 89.6.
  • It is not possible for anybody to receive an A in this class
  • Your grade would be C or higher if you study very hard.

Theme 3

💬 About Respect and Tone

  • she's very disrespectful when speaking to students.
  • She is SO RUDE!!
  • Kim is an amazing teacher who cares about her students

Theme 4

🖥️ Online Experience

  • I highly suggest to meet her at office hours instead of writing emails.
  • she expect everyone to have camera on .
  • , and answers e-mails quickly.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

38

Recent reviews read by the AI

38

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-eight reviews across online and and strong theme consistency.

Inside 38 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ESL21A11 reviews
ESL11A8 reviews
ESL19B8 reviews
21A6 reviews
19B2 reviews
Show 3 more courses
10W1 review
15321 review
ESL1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 8 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 4

C range

5

C 5

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1