AI Rate Professor

Physical Sciences

Natalya Lev

PHYSICS68 · PHYS14 · PHY22 · PHYSICS21 · PHYS21 · PHYSICS23 · PHY7 · P2812 · PH6 · PHYSIC9 · PHY21 · PHYSI1653 · PHYSI6 · PHYS8 · PHYSIC22 · PHYSICS6 · PHYSICS8 · PHYS6 · PHY06 · PHYS67 · PHYS006 · PHY6 · PHYS7 · PH67 · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
54.55%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you will attend every lecture, master her note style, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerThick accentLots of homeworkTough graderLecture heavyDisorganized
  • Physics is hard with , and strict diagram/color expectations.
  • some praise caring help and ; and disorganized.
  • Accent and organization issues are the most repeated frustrations across years.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

, and little curve mean an A usually requires heavy consistent effort.

Almost ; the one online review does not prove an easy A.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Physics concepts plus fast pacing and lecture-dependent content make the material tough for average students.

In-person majority drives this; online also reports high difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and skipping is tied to poor outcomes.

In-person reviews dominate; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Take-again near 55% with .

In-person is mixed; the lone online review is negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

36/100

, and disputed fairness keep grading on the strict side despite occasional extra points.

Format shift

In-person students report both harsh and ; online calls her a .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

, and lots of problem practice create a heavy load.

Format shift

Heavy workload appears in both formats, mainly documented in person.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Caring and content-strong for and condescending for others, with accent and organization as recurring barriers.

Format shift

In-person is highly polarized; online experience reported as poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Students repeatedly call the class test-heavy with and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

dedicated students who take notes, do colorful diagram homework, and use office hours can succeed; , and unfair or .

Main concern

Disorganization, accent comprehension, and test difficulty punish students who need clearer structure.

What students said

“Yes her Russian accent is scary from day 1, but so well.”
PHY22
“ . Her teaching is very unclear, her lectures were a complete waste of time.”
PHY7
“Self taught class. She cares way more about diagrams and colors then how to do the problem.”
PH6

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single online review reports low audio quality, hard-to-understand accent, expensive materials packet, and unhelpful answers.

Main concern

Accent plus poor audio and .

What students said

“Online was difficult because of her accent and audio was low quality. and students had to purchase some online packet.”
PHY21

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are widely described as very hard, sometimes with typos, and .

Hard testsLecture-note based examsDiagram/color gradingLimited curve

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person , and strict diagram standards more than software proctoring.

Extremely difficult examsTests from lecture notesStrict diagrams and colorsNo reliable curve
“ , and there were at many typos in all of them throughout the semester.”
PHYS21
“ . HW doesn't do much. .”
PHYSICS21
“ but and do similar book problems.”
PHY21

Online

One online review ; focus is on organization and materials cost.

Lots of homeworkTough grader
“ and students had to purchase some online packet that contained all the , and textbook.”
PHY21

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Her teaching is very unclear, her lectures were a complete waste of time. She's very condescending and you can't ask her anything because she gets mad at you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 42 reviews (1 online, 41 in , and split caring-vs-harsh themes. Credibility rating: High.

🗣️ Accent & Clarity Barrier

40/100

“my only issues are that its difficult to understand her very thick accent and when asked if she could write down what shes saying she says we just need to pay attention more.”

📐 Diagram Obsession

30/100

“ if diagrams aren't perfect.”

❤️ Caring But Strict

55/100

“Professor Lev is a sweetheart. She really cares for her students and has a .”

🧪 Brutal Tests

34/100

“ , and there were at many typos in all of them throughout the semester.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Super smart woman... so well.
  • Very bad at teaching.
  • but there's a method to her madness.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you don't know the material.
  • If you do all the HW and go to her office hours, you can get an A.
  • correctness.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Overall sweetheart.
  • She is extremely particular teacher.
  • but !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

42

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

42 reviews over many years with , and organization provide strong though polarized evidence.

Inside 42 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 513
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 59

Course coverage

PHY215 reviews
PHYS65 reviews
PHY64 reviews
PH63 reviews
PHY72 reviews
Show 19 more courses
PHYS212 reviews
PHYS72 reviews
PHYSI62 reviews
PHYSICS82 reviews
P28121 review
PH671 review
PHY061 review
PHY221 review
PHYS0061 review
PHYS141 review
PHYS671 review
PHYS81 review
PHYSI16531 review
PHYSIC221 review
PHYSIC91 review
PHYSICS211 review
PHYSICS231 review
PHYSICS61 review
PHYSICS681 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3