AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Emmanuel Owaka

INTALG · M201054 · MATH20 · MATH2 · MTH201054 · MATH84 · MATH18 · M85 · MATH31 · MATH32 · MATHALG · MATH2619 · 74 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you will show up, do the homework, and ask questions; skip if you need a low-effort online-style class or cannot adapt to his accent.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPatient step-by-step lecturerHW mirrors examsAccent polarizes studentsAttendance and notes matterFair if you put in work
  • Most students who attend, take notes, and and .
  • A sizable minority struggle with his accent, board writing, and pacing and feel unprepared for tests.
  • Exams and quizzes track class examples for many reviewers; a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many students report A or A+ , and study reviews; effort is required but .

Nearly all Easy-A ; the one online review ended in drop and does not support easy grades.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is standard community-college algebra with manageable difficulty if you keep up, though winter/summer pace can feel fast.

Difficulty ratings and ease claims .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and stress that skipping lectures hurts quiz and .

Both the online review and as required or strongly enforced.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

; fans praise clarity and care while critics mainly cite accent and organization.

Recommendation ; the sole online review strongly advises against him.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

and homework-aligned tests help many earn As; a minority call him a .

Format shift

; online evidence is too thin to judge.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

and quiz prep are common; workload is steady rather than light, but usually predictable.

Format shift

Lots-of-homework tags appear mainly in in-person MATH18/20/31 comments.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

and willingness to re-explain win most students; accent and illegible writing remain the main friction.

Format shift

Strong teaching praise is almost all in-person; the online review describes unusable lectures.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and exams all matter; tests often mirror class and HW examples.

Format shift

Assessment pattern is described in in-person reviews; online .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews dominate and are mostly positive: , and easy As for engaged students, with recurring accent and handwriting complaints.

Main concern

and ; accent and messy board work trip up some learners.

What students said

“Do HW, study, ask questions, and go to the !”
MATH20
“As long as you show up to class, participate, ask questions and do the .”
MATH18
“I've always struggled with math and Owaka has been hands down the .”
MATH31

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative: poor communication, hard-to-read work, weak syllabus, and a drop.

Main concern

Limited responsiveness and .

What students said

“Might be the . Doesn't respond to emails, can't read his handwriting and is very difficult to understand.”
MATH20

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and board examples, with some students saying tests still feel harder than practice.

HW-based quizzes and examsReview before testsIn-person quizzesLowest exam drop reported

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and and class problems, sometimes with review sheets and a dropped low exam.

HW mirrors examsPre-exam reviewDrop lowest exam
“ and quizzes and they are very similar to the .”
MATH20
“ ”
MATH31
“ board.”
MATH20

Online

.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do HW, study, ask questions, and go to the !”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (1 online, 49 in person), highlighting teaching clarity, homework-to-exam alignment, and accent concerns. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“I've always struggled with math and Owaka has been hands down the .”

📈 Effort For An A

78/100

“If you ask questions and HIS CLASS.”

🗣️ Accent Friction

45/100

“Very tough to understand with accent. Writes sloppy on the board.”

👍

72/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and all questions
  • and he goes through EVERY problem step by step
  • Lectures are very clear, test is

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Do HW, study, ask questions, and go to the !
  • A lot of HW but it was easy
  • I'm not good at math& I passed with an A! !

Theme 3

⚠️ About Accent & Clarity

  • Strong accent. Writes messy on board.
  • Might be the .
  • Extremely difficult to understand because of the strong accents.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

74

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews spanning many years, detailed comments, and consistent themes around homework, accent, and online review.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 546
4 out of 510
3 out of 57
2 out of 56
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH3119 reviews
MATH2012 reviews
MATH845 reviews
MATH184 reviews
INTALG2 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MTH2010542 reviews
M2010541 review
M851 review
MATH21 review
MATH26191 review
MATH321 review
MATHALG1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 2 · A 7

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1