AI Rate Professor

Social Science

Claudia Szekely

ECON1 · MICROECON · ECON2 · ECON1681 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Prefer her in person if you want solid econ help; .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful In PersonOpen Note QuizzesExtra CreditOnline DisorganizedLecture Heavy
  • In-person students , and .
  • Online sections draw complaints about disorganization, missing due dates, and .
  • Fair if you attend and study; not ideal for .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Open notes, dropped scores, and help, but content still requires real study for an A.

In person feels more manageable; online feels harder due to weak structure.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Econ concepts need brain power and note-taking, though .

Online reviews call macro especially hard; in person is standard difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

and skip class means you will not pass.

In ; online has no real class meetings but needs self pacing.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

online sections.

In person leans WorthIt; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Open-note quizzes, one-page note sheets, dropped lowest scores, and softens grading.

Format shift

More lenient support described in person than online.

Workload

Light

72/100

; , and occasional group work.

Format shift

; in person has light weekly load.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

, and , while online delivery is criticized as disorganized.

Format shift

Good to excellent in person; poor to average online.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, and .

Format shift

Online split about 50% assignments and 50% quizzes; in person is quiz and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students mostly like her teaching, open-note , and willingness to help, with .

Main concern

and fast-paced lectures hard to keep up with.

What students said

“Your grade is comprised of quizzes which you have every class time and are open note as well as a midterm and page of notes in.”
ECON1
“ , and she provides *A LOT* of help... Easy A.”
ECON2
“The work is not easy and takes a lot of brain power to understand but .”
ECON1

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews warn of disorganized presentations, end-of-semester deadlines only, and .

Main concern

No intermediate deadlines and weak online organization make it easy to fall behind.

What students said

“ . The presentations are so disorganized, and on top of that, you can't see the answers to incorrect questions on quizzes OR tests.”
ECON2
“there are no real due dates - everything just has to be finished by the end of the semester. You should definitely be a good self motivator because it's really easy to fall behind.”
ECON1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and often drop a low score, which is relatively student-friendly.

Open note quizzesOne page of notesDropped lowest examExtra credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person quizzes are often open note; and .

Open note quizzesOne page note sheetDrop lowest testExtra credit
“quizzes which you have every class time and are open note as well as a midterm and page of notes in.”
ECON1
“3 exams, you can take a full page of ”
ECON2

Online

Online quizzes and tests exist, but and deadlines pile up at semester end.

End-of-semester deadlinesNo wrong-answer feedbackOnline quizzes and tests
“you can't see the answers .”
ECON2
“50% online assignments and 50% quizzes.”
ECON1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is an amazing teacher. I was very worried to start econ1 but the way she teaches really makes it understandable. She really cares and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, contrasting strong in-person help with weak online structure. Credibility rating: Medium.

🧑‍🏫 In-Person Clarity

78/100

“the way she teaches really makes it understandable. She really cares and .”

💻 Online Warning

25/100

“ . The presentations are so disorganized”

📝 Open-Note Support

78/100

“allows one page of .”

⚖️ Format-Dependent Rec

55/100

“In person she's extremely helpful, but .”

Theme 1

📘 About Teaching In Person

  • .
  • She is so helpful. If you have a question she will answer it!
  • teaches incredibly well.

Theme 2

🖥️ About Online Experience

  • presentations are so disorganized
  • no real due dates

Theme 3

📊 About Exams and Help

  • open note
  • gives out like candy
  • Easy A.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews span many years with a ; older sparse grades lower confidence slightly.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ECON19 reviews
ECON25 reviews
ECON16811 review
MICROECON1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2