AI Rate Professor

Design Technology

Cathy Karol-Crowther

ET92 · ANIM10 · ET89 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Great pick for hands-on figure drawing if .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring mentorStrong feedbackLive modelsSkill growthKind but soft critique
  • and improvement
  • Students call her caring, respected, and hands-on with models
  • One online reviewer felt feedback was too soft to improve drawing skill

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Multiple As and low-to-moderate and practice.

Online felt easiest; in-person still reported As with more structure.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Beginning figure anatomy is approachable, with difficulty mostly around practice rather than abstract theory.

Online difficulty was very low; in-person sat around moderate.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, while ET92 reports mandatory attendance.

Online and one in-person note optional; another in-person notes mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students praise care and skill growth, though one .

; online recommendation is weaker.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Students report As and .

Format shift

Consistent across formats in .

Workload

Light

70/100

Studio practice and handouts dominate; no heavy textbook load.

Format shift

Online was especially light; in-person adds live-model studio work.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

, and constant coaching.

Format shift

In-person teaching is excellent; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment centers on drawing practice, handouts, and studio work rather than formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and constant walk-around coaching with strong skill growth.

Main concern

.

What students said

“ and she constantly walks around to see the student's work and offer guidance.”
ET92
“Taking Cathy's class was the first time I ever took a figure drawing class, and my work has improved times 1000.”
ET92

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online ANIM10 was easy and kind but .

Main concern

.

What students said

“even though you draw a stick figure, she likes that instead of . You can not improve your drawing skills with her.”
ANIM10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize studio drawing and .

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person work is live-model studio practice with .

Live modelsStudio critiquesHandouts
“ and she constantly walks around to see the student's work and offer guidance.”
ET92

Online

; and kindness.

Studio drawing focus
“even though you draw a stick figure, she likes that instead of .”
ANIM10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and she constantly walks around to see the student's work and offer guidance.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (1 online, 3 in person), highlighting studio coaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎨 Teaching Craft

88/100

“she guides you to "see" better and draw better!”

🌱 Skill Growth

90/100

“my work has improved times 1000.”

💞 Care & Respect

85/100

“She is so kind and lovely person but not a good professor.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • constantly walks around to see the student's work and offer guidance
  • Lots of handouts and intro to different styles!
  • We visit museums, gardens, beaches to alter the environments.

Theme 2

📈

  • even though you draw a stick figure, she likes that instead of
  • You can not improve your drawing skills with her.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Four detailed reviews from 2014-2022 mostly align on care and growth, with one online dissent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ET922 reviews
ANIM101 review
ET891 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values