AI Rate Professor

Art

Domenic Piturro

ART40A · ART75 · DES213 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Strong pick for design-focused sections if and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardSupportive MentorDesign ThinkingMixed Attendance RulesAccessible Outside ClassCourse-Dependent
  • Design and Maya , and creative freedom.
  • One studio review alleges misleading policies on due dates, , and .
  • Outcomes appear highly course-dependent rather than uniformly easy or hard.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

, but one review shows attendance and hidden rules can tank outcomes.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Students describe meaningful design challenges rather than free rides or extreme theory overload.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Multiple comments say , and one claims it can dominate the .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Two of three students strongly recommend him for mentorship and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Positive reviews emphasize growth and feedback; and deadline handling.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Project-based studio work is challenging but not described as busywork overload.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

, and strong at teaching design thinking, with one severe dissent.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment centers on design projects and studio work more than traditional exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person design and Maya courses are mostly praised as supportive and skill-building, with and deadline policy.

Main concern

Possible mismatch between stated flexibility and .

What students said

“ to both design well and think like a designer”
DES213
“attendance counts for MORE THAN 50% OF . .”
ART40A
“I wish we had more class with Professor Piturro.”
ART75

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on design projects and studio deliverables rather than proctored exams.

Project-Based AssessmentNo Traditional Exams Mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person sections emphasize projects and design work with .

Project-Based Assessment
“will show you how to both design well and think like a designer, and pushes you to succeed in new challenges.”
DES213

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Domenic is one of !”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting mentorship strengths and policy concerns. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“will show you how to both design well and think like a designer, and pushes you to succeed in new challenges.”

👍 Recommendation

68/100

“ !”

⚠️ Policy Clarity Risk

30/100

“He says everything is due at the end of the semester and that , but dont believe him.”

Theme 1

🎨 About Mentorship

  • He even let me deviate from the set curriculum in his class to focus on my specific design interests!
  • I recomand you to take this class with him before going to Animation or Architecture.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Policies

  • attendance counts for MORE THAN 50% OF .
  • Domi is a liar and bad teacher.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three recent reviews exist, with strong positive-negative split that limits confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART40A1 review
ART751 review
DES2131 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values