AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Jeffrey Haig

ACCTG1 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Online ACCTG1 can work if you do every homework chapter; .

Best fit · Self Taught ProClear Grading CriteriaLots of HomeworkFormat SplitHelpful OnlineHarsh In Person
  • Online students earned As and .
  • The zero empathy or learning.
  • Experience quality swings hard by format despite high grades across the board.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

All three reviewers earned A or A+; .

Both online and ; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Accounting content with .

Online difficulty ratings are 4; in-person rated difficulty 1 but still bashed teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

In-person attendance was mandatory; .

Online more flexible; in-person mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

; the in-person student strongly would not.

; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

and multiple A .

Format shift

; in-person still received A+ despite total dislike.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Online finds him helpful and clear; in-person reports zero learning or empathy.

Format shift

strong online, disastrous in-person review.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

; exams matter but practice work is central.

Format shift

Online comments .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

no empathy, no insight, no learning despite an A+ grade.

Main concern

Zero teaching value and zero empathy reported.

What students said

“Jeffrey is a failed professional turned teacher. 0 empathy, 0 insightful lectures, 0 learning. 0/10”
ACCTG1

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and caring help; and As.

Main concern

and time-consuming but necessary for exams.

What students said

“As long as you do the hw and and read the chapter, you will be fine. The while to complete”
ACCTG1
“The , but they're so necessary in order to do well on the exams.”
ACCTG1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams reward fully understanding homework and chapters; .

Homework-Driven ExamsChapter Reading

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

grade.

Online

Exams go well if you complete and and chapter reading.

Homework-Based PrepChapter Reading
“The , but they're so necessary in order to do well on the exams.”
ACCTG1
“As long as you do the hw and and read the chapter, you will be fine.”
ACCTG1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“As long as you do the hw and and read the chapter, you will be fine. The while to complete but once you understand it you will be able to pass the exams.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (2 online, 1 in person), highlighting the sharp format split. Credibility rating: Low.

💻 Online Helpfulness

78/100

“He was very helpful in explaining any questions I had and .”

📚

30/100

“The , but they're so necessary in order to do well on the exams.”

⚠️ In-Person Warning

10/100

“Jeffrey is a failed professional turned teacher. 0 empathy, 0 insightful lectures, 0 learning. 0/10”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • 0 insightful lectures, 0 learning
  • Enjoyed the class overall and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • As long as you do the hw and and read the chapter, you will be fine.
  • Be sure to do all the
  • A+ grade despite total dislike of teaching

Theme 3

📋

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews with a stark online versus in-person split make overall conclusions fragile.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACCTG13 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values