AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Rebekah Cordeiro

CHEM10 · CHEM19 · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
67.74%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you will put in serious weekly hours and ; skip if you need an easy chem grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardText-anytime mentorExam correctionsCOVID polarizationTest heavyLots of homework
  • Many students call her one of the , and grade recovery options.
  • COVID-era reviews spike with , and cheating-related conflict.
  • Success requires doing every module, problem set, and correction; not a low-effort A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

and help, but chemistry workload and tough tests mean an A still takes real effort.

Online recovery options are praised more; several in-person and COVID reviews call her a .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Intro chem content is conceptually heavy and practice-intensive .

Both formats call the material hard; summer/online intensives feel especially packed.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Some sections are optional or no-zoom; and warn skipping hurts.

; several in-person CHEM10/19 reviews say yes.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and clarity, tempered by sharp COVID and test complaints.

Online fans are very strong; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

Retakes, , and late work flexibility coexist with and hard quizzes.

Format shift

; some COVID cohorts felt grading turned harsh.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

, and tests demand many hours, especially in short sessions.

Format shift

Lots of ; summer online is described as 5-8 hours daily.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

and constant help; bottom reviews say lectures miss depth and tests feel unfair.

Format shift

Polarization is stronger around the 2020 transition than pure format.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Quizzes and and labs supporting practice.

Format shift

and in-person critical reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person ranges from life-changing clear lectures to warnings that and lectures lack depth.

Main concern

and a few interpersonal complaints.

What students said

“She is literally the .”
CHEM10
“ .”
CHEM10
“Doesnt know how to talk to students, can come off rude and arrogant.”
CHEM19

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

many praise no-zoom flexibility, texts, and corrections; .

Main concern

Sudden harder assessments and distrust around cheating during remote transition.

What students said

“ understand way imaginable.”
CHEM10
“After this whole coronavirus thing she went full crazy mode on us. and ”
CHEM10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Standard high-stakes chem assessments with some recovery tools; .

Quizzes and examsExam correctionsExtra creditTest heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

44/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and redo/half-point recovery, with critics saying exams do not match homework.

Challenging examsQuiz redosHalf points back on examsTest-homework mismatch complaints
“She allows opportunities to redo quizzes, and .”
CHEM19
“The material that she tests you on has no relation to the has taught”
CHEM10

Online

Online students mention , and corrections; some say remote exams got much harder.

Weekly quizzesExam correctionsFinal replaces worst testHarder pandemic quizzes reported
“There are weekly modules with chapter lectures, problem sets, quizzes, labs, and a test. .”
CHEM19
“ and and exams.”
CHEM10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Cordeiro is the best teacher I've ever had, hands down. understand way imaginable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 reviews, balancing strong praise with COVID-era criticism. Credibility rating: High.

📱 Always Reachable

85/100

“She gives you her number so if you ever need help you can just text her and she'll always help.”

🔁 Grade Recovery Tools

70/100

“She allows for & , and responds to q's quickly via text/email.”

🧪 Hard Chem Reality

34/100

“Be prepared to put in almost 5-8 hours everyday for summer session if you want a good grade.”

⚠️ Polarizing COVID Era

30/100

“I . She's unable to lecture and teach the course material effectively.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • understand way
  • she made chemistry fun!
  • and intriguing

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you study and do your work, you'll be totally fine
  • Anything below a B is because you absolutely put no effort
  • Her quizzes are very hard and

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • one of the kindest professors I've ever had
  • She cares and wants you to learn and pass
  • can come off rude and arrogant

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

31 detailed recent reviews with ; sample size and specificity support a medium-high confidence blended view.

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 58

Course coverage

CHEM1021 reviews
CHEM1910 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

28 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 4 · A 9 · A- 1

B range

8

B+ 5 · B 3

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1