AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Gohar Petikyan

MATH54 · MATH81 · MATH85 · MATH20 · MATH84 · MATH18 · MATH31 · 38 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
29.63%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Avoid unless no other math option exists and and police your own grades.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedDoes Not ReplyReads PowerPointsLate to ClassExam-Heavy Math
  • Recent MATH54 reviews are overwhelmingly negative on organization, communication, and reliability.
  • Some lower-level or self-driven students still pass with .
  • yet poorly timed, while learning often requires teaching yourself.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some , but grading errors and exam weight make an A inconsistent.

Online recent reviews feel harsher on process; older in-person comments more often mention easy-pass paths.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Math content itself is not always described as advanced, but poor teaching and pacing make the experience harder than the syllabus.

Both formats say the real difficulty is instruction quality more than pure theory depth.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Many sections require attendance or warn that skipping means failing, even when students expected flexible schedules.

; in-person often says skip and you will not pass.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

and recent reviews repeatedly say stay away due to disorganization and non-response.

Online ; in-person has a minority of positive outliers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Some students call her an , but others report wrong grades, lazy scoring, and tough or biased marks.

Format shift

pass; online more often cite chaos than leniency.

Workload

Heavy

36/100

and multi-part, even when it is not carefully graded or clearly scheduled.

Format shift

Online and shifting due dates.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Dominant themes are late starts, PowerPoint reading, thick accent issues for some, and .

Format shift

Online recent sections are especially negative; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades often hinge on exams and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed historically but still lean negative: , and self-teaching are common themes.

Main concern

Unreliable grading and .

What students said

“ do something and ends up forgetting or doing the complete opposite.”
MATH54
“You come to class and hear her read PowerPoints.”
MATH54
“ .”
MATH54

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online MATH54 reviews hammer disorganization, missed emails, , and .

Main concern

No reliable communication and constantly changing deadlines.

What students said

“ and forgets things, also she teaches from reading straight of PowerPoint of the textbooks summary.”
MATH54
“The DUE DATE always CHANGEEEEEEEEEE without any notice !!!”
MATH54
“Prepare for .”
MATH54

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

formula-sheet tests to sudden pop exams with little notice.

Exam HeavyOpen Note (some sections)Pop QuizzesFormula SheetsTest Corrections (some sections)

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

some terms and pop or poorly aligned exams in others.

Open note examsFormula sheetsPop quizzesTest corrections
“ .”
MATH54
“She lets you use formula sheets and sometimes even open book.”
MATH54
“ and never have a set date.”
MATH54

Online

Online reviews emphasize poorly announced exams and weak .

Erratic exam noticeZoom final mentionedHeavy homework before tests
“never do any notification for exams.”
MATH54
“ and I am so disappointed in her.”
MATH54

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dont take this professor. I signed up for a flex w/ sched. exams, but on first day of .”

Voice snapshots generated from 38 reviews, highlighting long-running organization and communication failures. Credibility rating: High.

🚫

28/100

“STAY AWAY.”

📂 Chronic Disorganization

25/100

“Homework and . Will say an and forgets about it”

📵 Poor Communication

20/100

“ .”

📗

30/100

“You will teach yourself 97% of the time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She often shows up late to class and rushes through lectures
  • she's so clear and .

Theme 2

📈

  • Grade is dependent on .
  • The upside is shes an
  • Make sure that your grade is correct on the grade book

Theme 3

⚠️ About Reliability

  • constantly shows up late
  • She doesnt read emails or messages
  • the whole class decided to report her to the Math department.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

38

Recent reviews read by the AI

38

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

38 reviews over many years show a durable pattern of disorganization and low recommendation, especially in recent MATH54 feedback.

Inside 38 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 517

Course coverage

MATH5421 reviews
MATH314 reviews
MATH844 reviews
MATH854 reviews
MATH202 reviews
Show 2 more courses
MATH812 reviews
MATH181 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 2 · A- 2

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 5

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Audit/No Grade 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Pass 1