AI Rate Professor

Art

Marc Kompaneyets

ART21 · ART1153 · ART4024 · ARTANAT · ART1 · 20A · ART20 · ART20A · DRAWING2 · ART30B · ART21A · ART20B · ART30C · ART4026 · ART1150 · ART31 · ART30 · 55 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
88.89%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you are serious about improving as an artist and can handle weekly studio grind and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerMaster IllustratorTough But FairAmazing DemosWeekly HomeworkAttendance Critical
  • Majority call him among the gains.
  • He is a and improvement with heavy weekly drawing work.
  • Attendance and participation matter; skippers and flakes struggle.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many As appear if you work hard and improve, but unrealistic.

In-person dominates; the one online review also calls him tough but fair.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Studio skill building weekly drawings long classes and high expectations make content demanding.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Most reviews mark attendance mandatory with skip-class-you-wont-pass style expectations.

; in-person is largely mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

About 89 percent would take again and serious art students repeatedly say do not hesitate.

Strong in-person consensus; single online review also highly positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

yet grades on improvement and effort more than raw talent.

Format shift

Tough-but-fair theme appears in both formats.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

and critiques create a heavy studio load.

Format shift

Workload detail .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Professional artist with and widely praised skill transformation.

Format shift

Both formats praise mastery; volume is in-person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Studio work critiques weekly homework and .

Format shift

In-person studio pattern; online review does not contradict.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Large in-person sample praises demos feedback and real improvement while and sometimes strict critiques.

Main concern

and older harsh-critic complaints.

What students said

“Professor Kompaneyets is by the .”
ART20A
“I have been taking art classes all my life and never improvement even close to on the level I have in his art20A drawing class.”
ART20A
“This was a very time-consuming class, with ”
ART20B

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Single online review calls him the tough but fair with major skill growth.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Marc is the . He cares about all students and is a true master illustrator.”
ART21A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Art studio assessment via demos critiques and .

Studio CritiquesWeekly Drawing AssignmentsImprovement-Based GradingIn-Class Demos

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and demos; reviews do not describe proctored written exams.

Weekly HomeworkClass CritiquesParticipation MattersNo Traditional Exam Focus
“grades based on improvement, not on skill level. If you don't get an A or B you're just not trying.”
DRAWING2
“ but it's doable if you just make time.”
ART20A

Online

Single online review focuses on growth and tough-but-fair grading with no webcam or Lockdown Browser mentioned.

Tough But Fair GradingSkill Growth Focus
“He is a , but never unfair.”
ART21A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Marc is the . He cares about all students and is a true master illustrator.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (1 online, 49 in-person), highlighting mastery demos toughness and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Marc is by far the .”

📈

90/100

“never improvement even close to on the level I have in his art20A drawing class.”

⚖️

48/100

“He is a , but never unfair.”

📚 Heavy Studio Load

28/100

“This was a very time-consuming class, with ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he coaches us 2-3 times individually
  • You can definetly trust his knowledge

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you don't get an A or B you're just not trying

Theme 3

⏰

  • No more than 4 absences though
  • Skip class? You won't pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

55

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years and courses with detailed consistent themes on demos toughness and improvement.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 538
4 out of 54
3 out of 56
2 out of 57
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART21A15 reviews
ART20A9 reviews
ART20B4 reviews
ART30C4 reviews
ART213 reviews
Show 12 more courses
ART313 reviews
ART202 reviews
20A1 review
ART11 review
ART11501 review
ART11531 review
ART301 review
ART30B1 review
ART40241 review
ART40261 review
ARTANAT1 review
DRAWING21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 1 · A 8

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values