AI Rate Professor

Communication

Ashanti Blaize-Hopkins

JOURN1 · JOURN16 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you complete work consistently, but be careful with file submissions and grade appeals.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring journalism mentorClear assignment rhythmGood feedbackSupportiveOne grading dispute
  • Two strong reviews call her a gem with and real support
  • Workload is manageable if you stay on top of regular work
  • One student reported an

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Positive reviews say doing consistent work leads to an A, though one student lost a letter grade after a .

Online student earned A+ with steady work; and a disputed B+.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

and predictable, with moderate difficulty ratings overall.

Online difficulty rated low; and grading issue.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

as mandatory in two reviews and not mandatory in one, with little detail on enforcement.

Online and one in-person mark mandatory; the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Two glowing reviews outweigh one avoid review, producing a mostly positive but not unanimous recommendation.

Online and one in-person strongly recommend; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Clear criteria and of an inflexible final-grade decision.

Format shift

; the dispute comes from an in-person-tagged review about a summer course.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Consistent assignments and , but not described as overwhelming.

Format shift

In-person JOURN1 mentions lots of homework; online stresses consistency more than volume.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students highlight care, humor, respect, and excellent journalism mentoring despite limited sample size.

Format shift

Praise is strong online and in one in-person review; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments center on regular assignments and a .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments; exams are not clearly described.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

one calls her the grade.

Main concern

and file access.

What students said

“An gem. The if only she was able to each course that was being offered.”
JOURN16
“she refused to change though when she graded it she hadn't read it and then didn't tell me that she couldn't access the file.”
JOURN1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online JOURN16 felt supportive and predictable: , and help when students struggle.

Main concern

Only one online review, so confidence is limited.

What students said

“ so you already know what to expect after the first few weeks. pretty much, do your work and you will pass.”
JOURN16

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a ; assessment appears assignment-focused with a .

Assignment-drivenFinal project or paperLittle exam detail

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

after a file-access problem, not exam format.

Final grade impactFile submission risk
“she refused to change though when she graded it she hadn't read it and then didn't tell me that she couldn't access the file.”
JOURN1

Online

Online .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“An gem. The if only she was able to each course that was being offered.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting support, assignments, and . Credibility rating: Low.

❤️ Student Support

85/100

“also willing to offer additional help when students are !”

📝 Assignment Clarity

80/100

“the so you already know what to expect after the first few weeks.”

⚠️

40/100

“she refused to change though when she graded it she hadn't read it”

👍 Recommendation Split

72/100

“pretty much, do your work and you will pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very caring professor
  • An gem. The

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • pretty much, do your work and you will pass.
  • Lots of homework
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • extremely supportive!
  • Respected
  • Hilarious

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews create a thin evidence base, and opinions split between glowing praise and .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

JOURN162 reviews
JOURN11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values