AI Rate Professor

Biological Sciences

Brittany Ulrich

PHYS3 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

if you want a proactive, no-spoon-feed prep for nursing or allied-health programs and will come ready every day.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerProactive Learning RequiredGroup Activities FocusClear Grading CriteriaMust Prepare Before ClassNursing Program Prep
  • Highly praised gem who runs class time as group activities, not lectures.
  • Requires heavy pre-class prep with readings and Khan Academy; not spoon-fed.
  • but participation matters and style builds real program readiness.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Difficulty is high and success depends on consistent pre-class prep and participation, not .

Evidence comes only from the single in-person review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Rated difficulty 5 with and proactive group work rather than passive lectures.

Evidence comes only from the single in-person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

as not mandatory, though participation still matters in group activities.

Evidence comes only from the single in-person review.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Student called her a gem and gave a full 10/10 for preparing them for real program rigor.

Evidence comes only from the single in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

and an earned A with strong prep; not described as harsh or free.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Get ready to read plus pre-class videos and in-class group work demand steady effort.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students call her a gem whose active style builds real readiness for demanding programs.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Class time centers on group activities and participation more than traditional exams.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person PHYS3 is group-activity heavy; students must read and watch videos before class to succeed.

Main concern

Falling behind if .

What students said

“Dr Ulrich is a gem! But MUST come to class prepared as class time spent in group activities.”
PHYS3
“Read her course content & watch Khan Academy BEFORE class! Her style is different & requires you to be proactive! 10/10!”
PHYS3

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dr Ulrich is a gem! But MUST come to class prepared as class time spent in group activities.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting proactive prep and group-activity teaching. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Dr Ulrich is a gem! But MUST come to class prepared as class time spent in group activities.”

👍 Recommendation

95/100

“Her style is different & requires you to be proactive! 10/10!”

📚 Prep Load

28/100

“Read her course content & watch Khan Academy BEFORE class!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • class time spent in group activities
  • style is different & requires you to be proactive
  • Your Nursing/RT/DH/PA program you do next isn't going to be spoon fed to you

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Prep

  • MUST come to class prepared
  • Get ready to read
  • Participation matters

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only one detailed 2021 review; high internal consistency but too little sample and time span for strong confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHYS31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values