AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Deborah Curtis

N40 · N7 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Evidence is too thin and contradictory to trust; ask current nursing students before enrolling.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizingUnprofessional AccusationsAmazing LecturesKnowledgeableMixed Feedback
  • Only two reviews exist and they completely disagree on quality.
  • One student calls her the worst and unprofessional; the other praises detailed lectures and knowledge.
  • detail on exams.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One student earned a C+ and felt dismissed; the and , so an A is not free.

All .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Difficulty ratings are low to moderate, though case studies can feel hard while still being learnable.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

.

Only in-person evidence; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

and one strongly would, so recommendation splits evenly.

Split 50-50 from two in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Too little ; outcomes range from C+ to unfinished.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Light

68/100

Reported difficulty is low to moderate with case studies and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

unprofessional and distracted versus remarkable, detailed, no-notes lectures.

Format shift

Both reviews are in person and diametrically opposed.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mentions of case studies, assignments, and .

Format shift

In-person only; exams are not described clearly.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

one labels her unprofessional and dismissive, the other calls her the most knowledgeable nursing lecturer with hard but valuable case studies.

Main concern

Extremely inconsistent student experiences with almost no corroborating sample.

What students said

“Custis is the worse professor at SMC. She is unprofessional and does not care about student well-being.”
N7
“Professor Curtis is the most knowledgeable professor in the SMC nursing program. Her lectures are so detailed and she uses no notes.”
N40

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews mention hard case studies and assignments but .

Case Studies
“Case studies are hard but you'll learn a lot. Do the assignments and reading and you'll do great with her.”
N40

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Curtis is the most knowledgeable professor in the SMC nursing program. Her lectures are so detailed and she uses no notes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 conflicting in-person reviews only. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Polarizing Reputation

50/100

“It is a waste of time taking her class. .”

🎓 Teaching Praise

50/100

“Her lectures are so detailed and she uses no notes. .”

Theme 1

👎 Negative Experience

  • worse professor at SMC
  • unprofessional
  • does not care about student well-being
  • waste of time

Theme 2

👍 Positive Experience

  • most knowledgeable professor
  • lectures are so detailed
  • Amazing lectures
  • I learned so much with her

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews with opposite extremes and limited detail make conclusions unreliable.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

N401 review
N71 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1