Judith Remmes

ENGL26 · ENGL51956 · ENG1430 · ENGL10 · ENG21983 · ENG10 · ENGL21970 · ENG2ONLINE · RELIGSTUD · ENGL2 · ENG2 · ENG1 · ENG5 · HUM26 · ENGL01 · ENG26 · E2 · ENG1249 · ENGLI51 · ENGL1105 · ENG51 · E10 · ENGL1 · ENG15 · ENG21970 · ENGL21296 · ENGLISH5E · 132 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 36/100
RMP rating: 3.0/5
Take again: 29.17%
Difficulty: 4.1

The decision

Avoid unless you need her specific course and can match her analysis style while handling a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderOpinion-Based GradingHeavy Reading LoadWeekly Essay-Length DiscussionsPolarizing Personality

rather than effort alone.
Workload is heavy with daily or .
A vocal minority finds her inspiring and transformative; most report GPA risk and frustration.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

if they diverge from her preferred analysis, so an A demands heavy work plus alignment with her views.

Both online and ; online adds more complaints about messy grade recalculations.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

, and abstract lit or humanities content keep intellectual demand high.

Online and ; and midterm memorization load.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Many reviews mark attendance or timely weekly posts as .

In-person more often states class attendance required; online enforces early discussion deadlines as a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Low take-again rate and her inspiring if you work hard.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

and many reports of docking points for disagreeing or .

Format shift

and grade changes; in-person also cites disagreement penalties.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

Lots of , and constant reading make the load heavy for most students.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy discussion and reading; online accelerated sections feel especially packed.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

and inspiration while many call lectures or methods confusing, uncaring, or unfair.

Format shift

Positive teaching praise appears in both formats; harsh personality and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and sparse high-stakes items rather than a .

Format shift

Online is discussion-and-paper heavy; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person classes mix strong lectures for fans with , and complaints of point docks for disagreeing.

Main concern

, and subjective grading make the course feel like a full-time job.

What students said

“She expects us to treat her class like a full-time job without taking in consideration that most of us have 2-3 other classes”
ENG5

“Wants you to do lecture + reading + 13 discussion comments in 2 days, every week.”
HUM26

“Remmes is an amazing professor. Since it is not an Easy A, a lot of people complain. Just put in the work.”
ENG51

Remote format

Online

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online sections , and tough paper grading with frequent claims of personal-opinion scoring.

Main concern

Messy or opinion-driven grading and essay work.

What students said

“She changed the because she didn't want to give me an A as a ”
ENG15

“Be ready to do 6-8 discussion posts a week. That doesn't include the reading.”
ENGL2

“She grades based on her personal views, NOT your effort.”
ENG2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and sit beside high-weight discussions rather than open-book relief.

Midterm and FinalPhoto and Fact MemorizationDiscussion-Heavy Grade ShareFew High-Stakes Assignments

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

hinge on memorizing many images or terms with few graded assignments carrying high weight.

In-Person Midterm/FinalMemorization HeavyFew Graded Assignments

“at least 70% of photos and random facts about certain objects”
ENG26

“Overloads you with unnecessary info just to narrow it all down on the .”
ENGLI51

Online

Online reviews rarely detail proctoring; and weekly discussion scoring rather than webcam exams.

Paper-Focused AssessmentWeekly Discussion Scoring

“ . Stay on top of the reading and you'll be fine.”
ENGL10

“If you don't state what she is looking for exactly, she will .”
ENG15

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“If ! She grades based on her personal views, NOT your effort.”
Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews spanning online and in-person English and , and recommendation themes. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

24/100

“She grades based on her personal views, NOT your effort.”

📚

26/100

“Be ready to do 6-8 discussion posts a week. That doesn't include the reading.”

💔 Low Recommendation

30/100

“SMC has many other good professors in English.”

✨ Polarizing Inspiration

48/100

“She's such an inspirational teacher, who will lead you on a path of self-discovery.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

Not an Easy A at all.
She is an
She ruined my 4.0 GPA.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

if she disagrees with you
but does prefer when you agree with her analysis
, and study.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Workload

Lots of work, but .
expect to study more than 9 hour a week outside classroom time
Wants you to do lecture + reading + 13 discussion comments in 2 days

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

132

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews across many years and both formats show consistent themes on workload and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 549

4 out of 515

3 out of 59

2 out of 520

1 out of 539

Course coverage

ENG16 reviews

ENG154 reviews

ENG54 reviews

ENGL13 reviews

ENGL23 reviews

Show 24 more courses

20122 reviews

ENG219832 reviews

ENG262 reviews

ENG512 reviews

ENGL102 reviews

HUM262 reviews

12191 review

E101 review

E21 review

ENG101 review

ENG12491 review

ENG14301 review

ENG21 review

ENG219701 review

ENG2ONLINE1 review

ENGL011 review

ENGL11051 review

ENGL212961 review

ENGL219701 review

ENGL261 review

ENGL519561 review

ENGLI511 review

ENGLISH5E1 review

RELIGSTUD1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

A 4

B range

B+ 1 · B 7

C range

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

D 1

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 6

Judith Remmes

Avoid unless you need her specific course and can match her analysis style while handling a x x x.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

HardWork

Challenging

Mandatory

Avoid

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

⚖️ x x

📚 x x x

💔 Low Recommendation

✨ Polarizing Inspiration

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

⚠️ About Workload

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

Avoid unless you need her specific course and can match her analysis style while handling a .

⚖️

📚