AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Frank Georgie

POL51 · POLSC51 · POLS7 · PS51 · POSC7 · POLITICAL · PHILO51 · POL1 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want to actually learn politics and will do the work; skip if you want low-effort credit.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate politics mentorDemanding but worth itInspiring lecturerLots of workGrades fairly generously
  • Students call him one of the best political science teachers for depth and energy
  • Expect , and rigor
  • Online 8-week format is easier if you stay on top of

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

and , but papers and steady work still decide the A.

Online reviews sound easier for an A than older in-person rigor comments.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Content and workload feel rigorous in person even when the professor inspires deep learning.

Online comments describe an .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

; in-person notes stress engagement more than strict roll.

review.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

and life-changing for politics despite the workload.

; online stresses manageability, in-person stresses learning payoff.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

One detailed review says he grades easily even when the class feels hard.

Format shift

Leniency is clearest in older in-person comments.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

, and high expectations in person create real load.

Format shift

Online has daily quiz grind; and a .

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Students highlight enthusiasm, knowledge, movie examples, and genuine love of teaching politics.

Format shift

Praise is strong in both formats, with more depth in in-person narratives.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of quizzes, discussions, essays or papers, and .

Format shift

Online details quizzes and one essay; and a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students describe a rigorous, inspiring class with and a major paper, but strong learning payoff.

Main concern

Can go on long tangents and the .

What students said

“Georgie is the .”
POLS7
“His class is demanding and rigorous and often times frustrating.”
POLSC51
“he demands excellence and if you are not willing to work, then this class is definately not for you.”
PS51

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections can feel manageable with , and a final if you never miss deadlines.

Main concern

No makeups and .

What students said

“There are at 11pm, one essay, a final, and discussion questions every two weeks.”
POL1
“He does not allow so be on top of your game!!”
POL1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

timed quizzes, essays or papers, and a .

Daily quizzesFinal examMajor final paperNo makeup assignments

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

than advertised plus a major final paper ordeal.

TestsMajor final paperRigorous writing
“ as hard as he makes them out to be, but .”
POLSC51

Online

Online 8-week format uses daily quizzes, biweekly discussions, one essay, and a .

Daily quizzesOne essayFinal examNo makeups
“There are at 11pm, one essay, a final, and discussion questions every two weeks.”
POL1
“He does not allow so be on top of your game!!”
POL1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Everything I know about politics is because of him!”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews (2 online, 7 in-person), balancing passion, rigor, and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“Georgie is an amazing educator! One of the only educators ive had that makes me want to read the books!”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“Lot's of work, but great. !”

👍 Recommendation Strength

90/100

“ . Awesome Awesome teacher.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Energy

  • so dedicated and full of enthusiasm
  • puts L in LEARNING
  • can cite examples from movies

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He grades easily though
  • Tough but for good reason
  • It is an easy class if you do your part

Theme 3

⚠️

  • incredibly tangential and stray so far off topic

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Nine detailed reviews across online and and rigor, but sample size is modest and many are older.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

POL12 reviews
PHILO511 review
POL511 review
POLITICAL1 review
POLS71 review
Show 3 more courses
POLSC511 review
POSC71 review
PS511 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values