AI Rate Professor

Social Science

Deborah Frohman

MICROECONINTRO · ECON01 · ECON1 · ECON225 · MICROECON · ECON1742 · ECON1ANDEC2 · ECON1196 · ECONOMICS1 · ECO101 · ECON2 · MICROECONOMICS · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you already self-teach econ well and only need a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProBoring unclear lecturesSelf-study requiredGenerous grading scaleTalks about catsLecture heavy
  • Many students say lectures are fast, boring, and
  • pass
  • and , but teaching quality is widely panned

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many say an 85 percent curve, handouts, and can yield an A if .

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Material feels hard mainly because lectures fail to clarify concepts, not because content is advanced for self-learners.

Difficulty comments are all in-person.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

82/100

and you can pass from handouts alone.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

and the dominant if you need real teaching.

reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

80/100

Students repeatedly note 85 percent equals A, lenient short answers, and .

Format shift

Leniency evidence is in-person only.

Workload

Light

68/100

Often little or ; and occasional paper.

Format shift

Workload pattern is from in-person comments only.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Dominant theme is unclear, fast, boring lectures that force students to teach themselves.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Typical structure is midterms, cumulative final, sometimes a paper, with handouts as the study key.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person econ sections are lecture-heavy and ; , and online practice.

Main concern

Students report little real teaching value and must learn almost everything alone.

What students said

“Crazy bad teacher. This Covid-19 pandemic made things a lot worse, esp. with learning online... she is the . you can get.”
ECON01
“ if you can teach yourself”
ECON1
“Easy A, all you have to do is study the worksheets she publishes online.”
ECON1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are conventional midterms and lecture clarity.

Two midtermsCumulative finalPaperHandout-based testsExtra credit

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

final, and sometimes a paper, with fair but hard questions.

Two midtermsCumulative finalPaperGenerous A cutoff
“Two midterms, one cumulative final, one paper, plus 5% for attending her useless lectures.”
ECON1
“2 midterms, a final. she gives a lot of .”
ECON2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“nice lady, bad teacher”

Voice snapshots generated from 40 in-person reviews, . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“She is a very nice and funny person. BUT bad instructor!!!!!”

📈 Easy A

78/100

“Easy A, all you have to do is study the worksheets she publishes online.”

👎 Recommendation

18/100

“ !!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Lectures

  • lectures are boring as hell
  • speaks too fast
  • possibly the

Theme 2

📈

  • 85% and up is an A
  • she offers

Theme 3

📚

  • I had to memorize her handouts the
  • You can learn a lot mor from your book
  • if you can teach yourself

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

40

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Forty reviews over many years with highly consistent complaints about teaching and .

Inside 40 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 55
3 out of 56
2 out of 516
1 out of 58

Course coverage

ECON121 reviews
ECON27 reviews
ECON013 reviews
ECO1011 review
ECON11961 review
Show 7 more courses
ECON17421 review
ECON1ANDEC21 review
ECON2251 review
ECONOMICS11 review
MICROECON1 review
MICROECONINTRO1 review
MICROECONOMICS1 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1