AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Salvador Santana

RT6 · RT15 · RT60 · RTRT60 · RT1 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if ; expect a much harder ride in advanced sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate about RTQuiz from slidesStudy guides helpTough advanced coursesNo book in intro
  • Intro RT feels easy and handouts.
  • Advanced courses demand daily study, critical thinking, and .
  • He is widely seen as caring and strong for the respiratory therapy path despite one harsh outlier.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Intro sections and study guides, while advanced RT requires daily study for solid grades.

All evidence is in person; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

Difficulty swings from easy intro .

All evidence is in person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

as mandatory, especially in program-oriented classes.

All evidence is in person.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

and clarity, with only one strongly negative RT15 review.

All evidence is in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

; advanced courses are tougher and more critical-thinking based.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

, and occasional field trips form a steady but not endless load.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Students praise passion, slides, and care for the RT program, with one review calling him unprofessional.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Quizzes and and slide-based content.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

All reviews are in person; intro students call him easy and passionate, while but fair if you study.

Main concern

Advanced quizzes and .

What students said

“ and maybe join the program.”
RT1
“he is one of the and .”
RT6

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, while advanced exams can feel harder and less predictable.

Slide-based quizzesStudy guidesPowerPoint reviewCritical-thinking tests in advanced RT

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students say intro quizzes match what he announces, while and textbook study.

Quizzes from slidesStudy guides providedTough advanced tests
“ you on theres no more to it , he goes based on his slides.”
RT1
“ but if u read and .”
RTRT60

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and maybe join the program.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person , and advanced rigor. Credibility rating: Medium.

🌟 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Hes very passionate on what hes teaching.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“ . No book!”

🧠 Advanced Course Rigor

40/100

“The hardest class I took this semester but I learned a lot.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He really loves his job and wants you to learn about the RT program
  • Great professor that shows he cares
  • provides a lot of info during lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Tests

  • he
  • but if u read and
  • It's all about critical thinking

Theme 3

⚠️

  • Overrated class
  • Very unprofessional
  • Bring Welch Back!!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

64/100

Evidence confidence

consistent RT-program pattern with one sharp negative outlier.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

RTRT603 reviews
RT12 reviews
RT602 reviews
RT151 review
RT61 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1