AI Rate Professor

Life Science

Kay Azuma

ANAT01 · PHYS3038 · PHYS3 · PHYSIOLOGY3 · PHYS03 · BIOL2 · BIO1196 · BIO2 · PHYS2877 · PHYS33017 · PHYS2853 · BOT1 · BIO1216 · BOTANY1 · BIO1199 · BIOL555 · ANAT1 · BIO1202 · 158 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
23.53%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid unless you are a self-driven science student prepared for , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCondescendingTough graderHard examsAttendance criticalPolarizing science prof
  • Many students describe rude, condescending, or ego-driven classroom interactions.
  • , and demand heavy independent study with .
  • A minority who study intensely and use office hours defend her as fair and high-learning.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even strong students report studying many hours and still struggling to earn As .

; most A success stories are in-person with intense study.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Fast lectures, heavy content, and high independence make the intellectual load steep.

In-person anatomy, bio, phys, and botany reviews all stress difficulty; online agrees.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Skip class and you will not pass; lateness and .

In-person tags repeatedly say skip class you will not pass; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Would-take-again is about 24 percent and .

; positive recommendations are a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

; exams are frequently called extremely hard with little cushion.

Format shift

; online also tags tough grader.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Lots of , and heavy independent study are common.

Format shift

In-person describes notebooks of notes and daily work; online mentions self-teaching load.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Scattered personal digressions and condescending responses outweigh praise for subject knowledge.

Format shift

In-person has the strongest hostility reports; online also calls her rude and unapproachable.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Hard unit exams and and not simple multiple choice.

Format shift

; online focuses less on exact exam format.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person consensus skews strongly negative on attitude and through intense study and .

Main concern

Condescending interactions plus extremely hard tests make the experience high-risk.

What students said

“ ”
ANAT1
“ !!!!”
BIO2
“She does not GIVE you a grade, you have to earn it.”
ANAT01

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online and hybrid notes still describe rudeness, intimidation, hard work, and .

Main concern

Unapproachable tone and heavy self-teaching expectations persist online.

What students said

“She is not approachable your basically o your own just do everything she tells you.”
BIO2
“she is very intimidating and a bit of a dictator in the classroom.”
PHYS3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are widely described as extremely hard, high-stakes, and central to the grade.

Extremely hard examsTest heavyPop quizzesPractice-test aligned sometimes

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams are extremely hard, lecture-based, sometimes with pop quizzes and .

Extremely hard examsTest heavyPop quizzesAttendance penalties
“ . I would study 6+ hours for the test and go to her office hours and still didn't get A's in test.”
BIO2
“ and the whole thing isnt multiple choice.”
BIO2

Online

Online comments stress hard work and .

Hard examsSelf-study required
“if you study really hard for her class then you will get an A. But I really mean it when I say you have to study.”
PHYS3

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Never in my life have I had such an egotistical and condescending teacher. Unfortunately, the negative reviews are accurate.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (2 online, 48 in , and minority praise. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Classroom Climate

22/100

“Rude, condescending, narcissistic, humiliating.”

📝

25/100

“ . I would study 6+ hours for the test”

🔥 Minority Defense

70/100

“She does not GIVE you a grade, you have to earn it.”

🚪 Overall Verdict

20/100

“ ”

Theme 1

😠 About Attitude

  • egotistical and condescending
  • gets made for any little thing you do
  • berate a student and call him illiterate

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Skip class? You won't pass.
  • you have to earn it

Theme 3

🗣️ About Lectures

  • talks too much about her personal life
  • lectures are scattered
  • she needs to TEACH more

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

158

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years show consistent themes of , and low recommendation rates.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 533
4 out of 524
3 out of 516
2 out of 529
1 out of 556

Course coverage

BIO217 reviews
PHYS310 reviews
BOTANY15 reviews
ANAT014 reviews
ANAT11 review
Show 13 more courses
BIO11961 review
BIO11991 review
BIO12021 review
BIO12161 review
BIOL21 review
BIOL5551 review
BOT11 review
PHYS031 review
PHYS28531 review
PHYS28771 review
PHYS30381 review
PHYS330171 review
PHYSIOLOGY31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 4

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2