AI Rate Professor

Not Specified

SC Hutchinson

ANAT01 · BIO2 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid unless with almost no support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderSelf-Learning HeavyOverpacked CoursePlagiarism SensitiveHigh Difficulty
  • Only two reviews, both rate difficulty at maximum
  • Online BIO2 student says instruction is weak and
  • In-person ANAT01 student says she tries to cover too much in one semester

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

No easy-A signals; and maximum difficulty with .

Online review stresses tough grading; .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

8/100

Both reviews rate difficulty 5/5 and .

Online BIO2 and in-person ANAT01 both signal extreme difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

; in-person attendance not clearly described.

Only the online BIO2 .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

and ; no positive recommendation exists.

; in-person review is mild and old with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

; no evidence of leniency or curves.

Format shift

Harsh grading evidence is from the online BIO2 review.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

McGraw Hill quizzes and ; anatomy packs too much into one semester.

Format shift

Online describes heavy self-paced materials; in-person describes overcrowded content.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Online student says she does not help learning; older in-person note is neutral but not strong praise.

Format shift

Teaching criticism is strongest online; in-person sample is thin.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Quizzes and ; formal exam format is not clearly detailed.

Format shift

Assessment detail is mostly online BIO2; in-person lacks assessment specifics.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One in-person anatomy review notes the course packs too much into a semester.

Main concern

Course is overloaded for one term.

What students said

“She tries to do a lot of things in a single semester”
ANAT01

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online BIO2 is described as paid self-learning with , and unhelpful discussion.

Main concern

No real teaching support and harsh plagiarism sensitivity.

What students said

“getting on her class is just like paying money for self-learning. She is a and never take her bio2.”
BIO2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews prove tough grading and McGraw Hill quizzes/homework, but .

Tough GradingMcGraw Hill QuizzesHomework Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person ANAT01 review .

Heavy Course Load
“She tries to do a lot of things in a single semester”
ANAT01

Online

Online BIO2 uses McGraw Hill quizzes and ; proctoring software is not mentioned.

McGraw Hill QuizzesHomeworkTough GraderPlagiarism Sensitivity
“Quizes and does not help anything with the learning.”
BIO2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“getting on her class is just like paying money for self-learning. She is a and never take her bio2.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting self-study load and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Support

25/100

“she does not help anything with the learning. .”

📉 Difficulty

8/100

“She tries to do a lot of things in a single semester”

👎 Recommendation

15/100

“never take her bio2.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is a
  • Quizes and
  • She tries to do a lot of things in a single semester

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Support

  • paying money for self-learning
  • The .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only 2 reviews years apart with limited grade data and no consensus depth.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ANAT011 review
BIO21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values