AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Moya Mazorow

GEO1234 · GMTRY2546 · MATH20 · MATH1264 · MATH3132 · MATH10 · MATH28 · MATH13 · MATH32 · MATH7 · MATH29 · MA321073 · MATH85 · MATH07 · MATH18 · CS10 · MATH1632 · MAT18 · MATH02 · MATH2 · MATH49 · 135 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
18.18%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the material and can teach yourself everything from the textbook.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized LecturesTough GraderSelf-Teach RequiredTangent RantsTest Heavy
  • , and full of personal tangents.
  • Many students say they must teach themselves from the .
  • , and frequent drops make the experience high-risk.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Getting an A and luck because and lectures do not prepare you well.

; no online reviews were available.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content is already hard math and and go on tangents.

; no online reviews were available.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory and still say class time does not help learning.

; no online reviews were available.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students say and harsh outcomes.

; no online reviews were available.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and many low grades or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and payoff.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students , and unhelpful despite occasional praise for kindness.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tags and comments stress tests, quizzes, and few graded items over continuous practice.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math classes are described as , and heavy reliance on self-study.

Main concern

and and frustrated.

What students said

“ , but the . Goes off on tangents all time time and does not teach.”
MATH28
“Pros: : lazy, rude, unorganized, dismissive. .”
MATH7
“ and terribly . She does not ever really tell you what topic or section you are covering.”
MATH13

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and pop quizzes feel hard and poorly aligned with lecture, with .

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and pop quizzes are described as tough and poorly previewed in class.

Pop QuizzesTest HeavyHard Exams
“1st class: lecture on symbolic logic. 2nd class: Any questions? None? !”
MATH13
“You will not feel prepared for .”
MATH28

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , but the . Goes off on tangents all time time and does not teach.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews spanning many years, highlighting teaching chaos and . Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

28/100

“ . Can not lecture about any topic and seems unsure of herself throughout.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ unless you are good at teaching yourself.”

📝

28/100

“Grades incredibly hard and is very unhelpful. Really unfortunate waste of a semester.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Goes off on rants everyday at every slight second.
  • .
  • You're better off studying every single page of the book on your own.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Grades very very hard.
  • Tough Class & Prof
  • If your only option, wait for another professor next semester.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • , but the .
  • Sweet Woman, terrible instructor.
  • Genuinely one of the nicest math professors at SMC

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

135

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed in-person reviews across many years show consistent complaints about organization and teaching quality.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 529
4 out of 517
3 out of 514
2 out of 525
1 out of 550

Course coverage

MATH27 reviews
MATH136 reviews
MATH286 reviews
MATH324 reviews
MATH854 reviews
Show 17 more courses
MATH073 reviews
MATH73 reviews
CS102 reviews
MATH022 reviews
321 review
GEO12341 review
GMTRY25461 review
MA3210731 review
MAT181 review
MATH101 review
MATH12641 review
MATH16321 review
MATH181 review
MATH201 review
MATH291 review
MATH31321 review
MATH491 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Not sure yet 2