AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Stanley Hetch

MATH32 · MATH84 · MATHA84 · MATH21 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Consider him for a low-pressure math seat only if ; skip if you need strong instruction.

Best fit · Easy A HunterSuper chill mathClear grading criteriaWeak explanation riskEasy if you show up effortPolarized skill
  • , and easy if you put in basic effort.
  • Older reviews say he teaches poorly, moves slowly, and loses students at the board.
  • and the bar to pass appears low, but teaching quality is uneven.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Multiple students say he wants everyone to pass and basic effort can yield an A, with reported B .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Difficulty ratings and comments describe slow, easy material more than rigorous math challenge.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

if you are doing well and as no.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

, but older reviews strongly advise against him for teaching quality.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

and a pass-oriented vibe make grading feel student-friendly.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Light

72/100

Comments stress ease and basic .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Kind and accessible for some, but multiple reviews call the .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Students mention exams and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

to confusing board lectures.

Main concern

Teaching clarity is inconsistent and sample size is tiny.

What students said

“If you pay attn & put in basic effort, it can be an easy A.”
MATH32
“the most boring teacher ever. only rated so low because he is really bad at math himself, but and really easy.”
MATH21
“He doesn't know how to each, most of the time his up at the board you feel lost”
MATHA84

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but reviews do not prove open-book or .

Clear exam gradingIn-person exams

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews note exams and policies.

Clear grading criteriaExams
“ AND EXAMS.”
MATH32
“I got a B bc I hardly studied for the .”
MATH32

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you pay attn & put in basic effort, it can be an easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting ease versus weak instruction. Credibility rating: Low.

🧩 Teaching Quality

42/100

“he is bad at teaching and is very slow.”

🎯 Easy Grade Path

82/100

“just as long as youre doing well in the course”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • you feel lost because you have no idea what he is talking about
  • the most boring teacher ever

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • it can be an easy A
  • AND EXAMS
  • really easy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

34/100

Evidence confidence

Only five reviews across years with a sharp positive-negative split make conclusions fragile.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH322 reviews
MATH211 review
MATH841 review
MATHA841 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values