AI Rate Professor

Communication

Rebecca Avalos

COM21 · COMST21 · COMST35 · COMMST16 · COMM16 · COM11 · COMM37 · COMST11 · SPCH100 · COMMST21 · COM35 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
95.65%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Must-take for comm students who want growth and transfer-level rigor; show up, participate, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerInspirational Comm MentorThorough FeedbackParticipation HeavyTransfer-Ready RigorSpeech Confidence Builder
  • Students call her one of the , and personal support.
  • Expect challenging content, speeches or , and .
  • Grades are strong when you engage and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

As are common when students practice speeches and , but the work and standards are real.

Almost all evidence is in-person; the single online .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

, and high participation make content intellectually demanding.

In-person reviews dominate; online evidence does not change difficulty picture.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and participation is essential to succeed.

; online sample is too small for contrast.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Nearly every student strongly recommends her for inspiration, support, and real skill growth.

Strong recommendation holds in in-person reviews and the single online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

66/100

Clear criteria and free.

Format shift

Based mainly on in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Multiple speeches, reading, papers, and constant participation create a substantial load.

Format shift

In-person speech and argumentation courses drive the heavy-load reports.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students praise brilliant lectures, deep theory knowledge, and transformative mentoring.

Format shift

One online review also highly praises her presence and clarity.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Speeches, papers, projects, and .

Format shift

In-person speech and argumentation work dominate assessment mentions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person Comm classes build a , and high engagement expectations.

Main concern

Content and participation load are challenging; a rare critic found lectures monotone and slide-heavy.

What students said

“Hands down one of the .”
COMST11
“she is too good for this school”
COMST11
“Speaks very monotone. Participation is key.”
COMST35

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One online , and .

Main concern

Only one online review limits confidence about remote format details.

What students said

“The . Her presences and passion for the material and teaching it, is outstanding.”
COM11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize speeches, projects, and participation more than traditional proctored exams.

Speech PerformancesParticipationClear Grading CriteriaProjects

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person success centers on speeches, projects, participation, and .

Speech PerformancesParticipationProjects
“we're doing public speaking (5 speeches each in six weeks!)”
COMST11
“Participate constantly and ask for help, she will make ensure your .”
COMST11

Online

The single online review .

Clear Grading Criteria
“Shes straight forward. Amazing.”
COM11

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is the most incredible professor I have met in my entire American education journey.”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews (22 in-person, 1 online), highlighting inspiration, rigor, and speech growth. Credibility rating: High.

🌟 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Avalos is BRILLIANT!”

🔥 Inspiration Level

95/100

“Never had someone believe in me like she did.”

📚 Challenge Level

32/100

“Shes challenging and tough but inspirational too.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • perfected lectures to each class session
  • makes her classroom a totally comfortable environment
  • her brain just zooms by super fast

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy Grade
  • Participation is key
  • Get ready to read

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • , and just like a good friend/teacher
  • Avalos is inspirational
  • really cares

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

23 mostly recent, highly consistent reviews with rich detail and near-universal recommendation raise confidence despite one online review.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COMST118 reviews
COM215 reviews
COM352 reviews
COM111 review
COMM161 review
Show 6 more courses
COMM371 review
COMMST161 review
COMMST211 review
COMST211 review
COMST351 review
SPCH1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 5 · A 7 · A- 3

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Not sure yet 6