AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Christina J Jo

ESL21A · ESLX01 · 21A · ESL2415 · 21B · COS126 · ESL21B · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
36.36%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you have no choice; many report unfair grades and little real teaching.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderDo Not ChooseUnclear LecturesStory-Heavy ClassHard to Pass
  • Majority of students warn not to take her ESL .
  • Many say lectures are personal stories with little grammar teaching or .
  • A and passable if you follow rules and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Many report non-pass near 70 percent, blocked , and ceiling grades around C or B even with work.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content can feel easy for some, but and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Skip class and you won't pass tags and comments say .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Would-take-again near 36 percent with .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

; essays and journals return low and slow with little reason.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Essays, journals, quizzes, and papers; but .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Frequent claims she talks personal stories, skips grammar, and is hard to understand.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Essays, journals, quizzes, and exam focus.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person ESL sections are widely described as , and grade-risky with .

Main concern

Harsh or and .

What students said

“ .”
21A
“ if you want to pass.”
ESL21A
“ !!!!”
ESL21A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

in-class exams; reviews do not clearly prove proctoring tools.

Essay gradingQuizzes and journalsAttendance linked to passIn-person exams mentioned

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and and slow; phone use during exam was alleged once.

Essay focusedQuizzes and journalsHarsh essay scores
“I don't understand as well as how she became professor.”
ESL21A
“ . If you fail your first essay, you will never get good grades after that.”
ESL21A
“she didn't recognize that somebodies who .”
ESL21A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want to pass.”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 and weak teaching themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“She doesn't know how to teach, and doesn't know any grammars.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“ .”

⚖️

18/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her lecture was nothing. just waste your time and money
  • just talking her stories

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She tries to not pass the students
  • most students got 68%70%. I got non-pass
  • you will never get a higher grade than b and mostly everybody gets c

Theme 3

⚠️ About Warnings

  • !!!!
  • she is not a responsible teacher
  • to be honest, She is not a teacher

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-six in-person reviews over several years show and weak teaching.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 515

Course coverage

ESL21A10 reviews
21A8 reviews
21B2 reviews
ESL21B2 reviews
22511 review
Show 3 more courses
COS1261 review
ESL24151 review
ESLX011 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1