AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Alison Green

MATH31 · MATH26 · MATH20 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want structured math practice and are ready for .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLots of HomeworkBook-Based LecturesHelpful ReviewsMixed ClarityClear Grading Criteria
  • and often straight from the book.
  • , so dedicated students can still earn As.
  • organized step-by-step help versus boring, question-averse lectures.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is realistic if you grind the homework and use reviews, but the work volume is substantial.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Math content is standard difficulty; struggle comes more from homework volume than impossible concepts.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

and lectures are the main delivery of examples.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Great if you want deep practice and ; poor fit if you need interactive lectures or .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Several students call her an and reviews are completed.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Repeated reports of tons of .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

; others say she copies the book and shuts down questions.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and a final; reviews closely mirror exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and review-aligned tests.

Main concern

Lecture clarity and limited in-class question time.

What students said

“if you decide to choose her be prepared to work extra hard and do TONS of .”
MATH31
“ , and not like hard problems from book.”
MATH26
“Was a little boring BUT .”
MATH26

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

book problems, making them predictable if you prepare.

Review-Aligned TestsBook-BasedThree Tests Plus FinalNo Proctoring Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and reward completing homework practice.

Review-Aligned TestsSimilar to HomeworkThree Tests Plus Final
“ , and not like hard problems from book.”
MATH26
“she gives you reviews and the reviews she gives you are on the test.”
MATH26

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“if you decide to choose her be prepared to work extra hard and do TONS of .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, , and mixed lecture clarity. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚

22/100

“Homework ? More like , go home and do every single problem in the book”

📝 Fair Tests

62/100

“ , and not like hard problems from book.”

🎯 Teaching Split

55/100

“If you really want to understand math, this proffessor is great for that!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very organized, leading you step by step onto better math skills.
  • She copies straight out of the book, and her lectures are not easy to understand
  • Was a little boring BUT .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Do everything and you'll be fine. I got an A.
  • She makes sure her class passes with a good grade.
  • There is no room for questions; Lots of homework

Theme 3

📝

  • do TONS of .
  • .
  • the reviews she gives you are on the test.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only 6 in-person reviews with split opinions, but and review-based testing themes align.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH263 reviews
MATH202 reviews
MATH311 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1