AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Arkadiy Sheynshteyn

MATH54 · MATH81 · MATH02 · ALGEB4329 · MATH20 · MATH2 · MATH4088 · MATH2739 · MATH84 · MATH18 · MATH31 · MATH32 · STAT54 · MATH21 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
87.5%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Solid math choice if you attend, do the practice problems, and ask questions; results improve a lot with consistent effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPatient and helpfulClear conceptsRussian accentExtra credit availableExam-aligned homework
  • , and willingness to help outside class.
  • and often not collected, but .
  • A minority report disorganization, hard-to-read board work, or accent barriers.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Many call exams doable with attention and , but some find tests hard and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Average difficulty is low and many say he simplifies concepts, though pace and course level still vary.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

as important for understanding, even when not strictly required.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

and help, despite a consistent minority of harsh complaints.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

and curves help, but some call him a tough or .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Frequent problem sets or online HW and multiple exams; but still essential.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

and help; minority cite accent, board mess, and disorganization.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Multiple exams, quizzes, and a ; but not always collected.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

professor whose exams track book and board problems; success depends on attendance and practice, while a vocal minority dislikes accent and organization.

Main concern

Accent, board organization, and uneven pacing frustrate some students, especially in tougher courses.

What students said

“Did NOT collect HW, but assigned about 40-80probs. per week. The kids who did all the HW probs. did really good on the exams.”
MATH2
“ ! He really is there to help the student succeed, no matter what it takes.”
MATH31
“He is a nice guy but not a good teacher.”
MATH2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Expect and a and lecture problems, with occasional pop quizzes.

Multiple examsPop quizzesFinal examExams similar to book problemsOnline homework

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final; problems often mirror book and board work.

4 exams and finalPop quizzesBook-similar problemsOnline HW
“About 4 exams and 2 "pop"quizzes(he told us when) and Final.”
MATH2
“ ., but with different #'s.”
MATH2
“ but if you attend every single class and do the online hw you will pass.”
MATH31

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He teaches the and what we really need to learn. as long as you pay attention. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 in-person reviews spanning multiple math courses, balancing majority praise with minority criticism. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“He can simplyfy concepts and make it easy for students to understand.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“I suggest him wholeheartedly.”

📚

70/100

“The kids who did all the HW probs. did really good on the exams.”

⚠️ Polarizing Experiences

35/100

“THIS PROFESSOR IS HORRIBLE! IF YOU PAID ME TO SIT IN HIS CLASS.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he teaches and makes understand the concepts, not just memorizing formulas.
  • Dont be shy to ask questions, he will gladly help and explain.
  • Cracking jokes every now and then.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy A+
  • as long as you pay attention.
  • he gives many opportunities for .

Theme 3

⚠️

  • it's a little hard to understand him because of his accent
  • There is and skips around from topic to topic.
  • sometimes he gets really mad and starts yelling.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

and courses with rich detail and mixed but pattern-consistent opinions.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 57
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH316 reviews
MATH203 reviews
MATH213 reviews
MATH323 reviews
MATH813 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MATH843 reviews
MATH22 reviews
MATH40882 reviews
MATH542 reviews
ALGEB43291 review
MATH021 review
MATH181 review
MATH27391 review
STAT541 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 3 · A 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1