AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Julie Douglass

16A · 16B · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless , and a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy Paper LoadMandatory AttendanceHarsh FeedbackNot Worth Retaking
  • and heavy writing loads with .
  • ; one received a D after expecting a better grade.
  • Workload feels heavier than the unit value, with many papers and homework.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

and a D grade show an A needs heavy writing effort with little leniency.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students say the work feels like a 3-unit load with many papers and homework.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

and tone is strongly negative.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and a failed expectation of a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Tags and comments stress so many papers and lots of .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

One higher quality rating is outweighed by annoyance, failure frustration, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Papers and ; .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person ESL classes feel demanding, with , and lots of ; both students would not retake.

Main concern

and heavy writing load can tank grades despite effort.

What students said

“she is such annoying person. I was expecting good grade but she failed me because I wasn't adulatory :) and good luck.”
16B
“Don't think it is just one Unit class you should work as 3 units class and tough on grade.”
16A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exams; assessment centers on papers and homework.

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; students mainly discuss papers, homework, and .

“ , SO MANY PAPERS”
16B
“ ”
16A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Don't think it is just one Unit class you should work as 3 units class and tough on grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting grading harshness and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Low Recommendation

18/100

“No”

📝 Heavy Writing Load

24/100

“she is such annoying person. I was expecting good grade but she failed me because I wasn't adulatory :) and good luck.”

⚖️

22/100

“Don't think it is just one Unit class you should work as 3 units class and tough on grade.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • tough on grade
  • I was expecting good grade but she failed me

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • SO MANY PAPERS
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK
  • work as 3 units class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

and limited detail lower confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

16A1 review
16B1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values