AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Daniel Vaughan

CIS51 · CIS57WEBPLANN · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

Prefer him in person if available; avoid the online CIS51 format based on weak organization.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLate AssignmentsUnclear InstructionsCaring In PersonQuiz Heavy Online
  • In-person web planning class praised as caring and effective
  • Online CIS51 called disorganized with late posts and little learning
  • Easy grades appear possible with minimal challenge online

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Multiple A grades with low reported difficulty online suggest an easy path to A with light work.

Online reviews show very low difficulty; the .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Online difficulty ratings are 1 and ; in-person is moderate but still learnable.

; in-person was more substantial.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

.

Neither online nor .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

35/100

One enthusiastic yes for mixed overall advice.

; both online students would not.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students report A grades even when they learned little and work was ungraded.

Format shift

Online students still earned A grades despite poor organization.

Workload

Light

75/100

Online is mainly reading plus short quizzes; .

Format shift

Online workload is light quizzes; .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

but online teaching described as , and ineffective.

Format shift

In-person quality 5; both online ratings are 1.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Online focuses on chapter quizzes; and participation.

Format shift

Online is quiz-driven; and feedback.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and real learning in web planning despite mixed student skill levels.

Main concern

, so results may not generalize.

What students said

“I think he's a great teacher. Teaching web planning is not easy there are so many variables and the students level of experience varied... but he deals with everyone in a great way and you learn a lot.”
CIS57WEBPLANN

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online CIS51 reviews report late , and almost no learning beyond quizzes.

Main concern

Poor organization and .

What students said

“ and apologies.”
CIS51
“Each week consists of and taking a 10 question quiz about the content. So far after 7 weeks I've learned nothing.”
CIS51

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and assignments rather than strict proctored exams.

Weekly QuizzesChapter ReadingNo Clear Proctoring Mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person review does not clearly describe exams; focus is teaching and .

Online

Online CIS51 is framed as weekly .

Weekly QuizzesChapter ReadingNo Real Assignments
“Each week consists of and taking a 10 question quiz about the content.”
CIS51
“There are .”
CIS51

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Consistently posted assignments late with lame excuses and apologies. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting . Credibility rating: Medium.

🖥️ Online Organization Issues

20/100

“ and apologies.”

❤️

90/100

“ !”

📉 Little Learning Online

15/100

“So far after 7 weeks I've learned nothing.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I think he's a great teacher.
  • he deals with everyone in a great way and you learn a lot.
  • and doing the assignments yourself if you want to learn anything.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Each week consists of and taking a 10 question quiz
  • There are .
  • Instructions for and unclear.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Three 2017 reviews with mixed formats and consistent online criticism but .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CIS512 reviews
CIS57WEBPLANN1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values