AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Subhash Malakar

MATH8 · MATH54 · MATH02 · MATH2 · MATH20 · MATH15 · MATHSE52 · MATH7 · MATH52 · 86 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you are strong in , and can self-teach; otherwise find another professor.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing lecturerHard tests vs homeworkLecture heavySelf-study neededMonotonous delivery
  • and too fast, others call him fair and thorough.
  • ; low class averages and .
  • Attendance is often expected and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Many report , and needing huge effort for an A.

Evidence from 50 in-person reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and weaker students often struggle or drop.

Evidence from 50 in-person reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and falling behind if you miss class.

Evidence from 50 in-person reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

; success depends on math readiness.

Evidence from 50 in-person reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

, and ; occasional formula sheets help little.

Format shift

In-person reviews only.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

, and multi-chapter exams with heavy note-taking.

Format shift

In-person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Roughly split praise and criticism; clear for strong students, confusing and dull for many others.

Format shift

In-person reviews only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Multiple exams and ; quizzes and homework matter but .

Format shift

In-person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All 50 reviews are in person across precalc, stats, calculus, and related math. Polarizing: and fair tests; many report mumbling, illegible , and mandatory show-up.

Main concern

and exams much harder than practice work for weaker math students.

What students said

“Sections are covered WAY too quickly. He consistently scribbles illegible notes on the board”
MATH02
“ out so no surprises. Must come to EVERY CLASS!”
MATH54
“His test and and homework.”
MATH7

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; some courses allow formula sheets or .

In-person examsTests harder than homeworkTake-home quizzes sometimesFormula sheet sometimesNo curve often

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person multi-chapter tests frequently exceed homework difficulty; and formula sheets reported.

In-person examsHarder than homeworkTake-home quizzesFormula sheet
“His test and and homework.”
MATH7
“All the . Two projects and 3 exams and a final.”
MATH54
“you are allowed a formula sheet with notes for the exams.”
MATH52

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews across multiple math courses, balancing strong positives and negatives. Credibility rating: High.

👨‍🏫 Teaching Clarity

48/100

“ ”

📈

32/100

“The average score for the first exam was 32 out of 50”

👍 Polarized Recommendation

42/100

“I've taken a lot of math classes at SMC and he is the best!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • scribbles illegible notes on the board and speaks in such a low tone
  • lectures as if the student knows the subject already
  • and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • or quizzes
  • No and
  • to get A in this class, really need efforts

Theme 3

⚠️

  • The
  • Must come to EVERY CLASS!
  • don't miss class!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

86

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews spanning many years and courses with rich detail and recurring themes despite polarity.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 528
4 out of 521
3 out of 510
2 out of 513
1 out of 514

Course coverage

MATH5220 reviews
MATH5412 reviews
MATH025 reviews
MATH25 reviews
MATH73 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH152 reviews
MATH201 review
MATH81 review
MATHSE521 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1