AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Richard Kaplan

PHILO001 · PHIL01 · PHIL1 · PHILO1642 · PHILO1 · PHIL2832 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid unless you are fine teaching yourself from a syllabus and still want a passable grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear instructionsAbsent lecturesEasy grader if you submitHard to reachSelf-taught class
  • Most students describe almost no real teaching and blank or link-only lectures.
  • Assignments are essays and you can pass if you just submit work.
  • Response time and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students say if you submit the with almost no teaching.

All .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is not described as advanced; the pain is poor structure, not hard philosophy theory.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

; most others do not clearly describe policy.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most comments urge others not to take , and zero lectures.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Several students call him an if work is turned in.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Expect readings and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Dominant theme , and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades center on essays and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person flagged reviews still describe a hands-off course with , and little lecture content.

Main concern

You may not know where you stand until late and get almost no guidance.

What students said

“he is impossible to reach and ”
PHILO1
“ !”
PHILO1642
“ though, do assignments and you'll pass.”
PHILO1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mainly describe essay work and a syllabus-defined midterm/final with .

Essay assignmentsMidterm and final topics on syllabus

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students report essay-based work and proctoring detail.

Essay assignmentsSyllabus-based midterm and final
“ . or feedback.”
PHILO1
“a syllabus that gave the topic for the midterm and final”
PHILO1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“simply AWFUL. he just doesn't seem like he cares about the class. he is impossible to reach and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 , and low recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

24/100

“the lecture section is blank for every chapter, unless it has a bunch of links so the students can figure it out themselves”

📝 Easy Pass Path

78/100

“ though, do assignments and you'll pass.”

🚫 Recommendation

22/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • or feedback
  • His response time to questions was unacceptable

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • I never bought the textbook and made an A in the class!
  • though, do assignments and you'll pass.
  • I believe I will be receiving a fairly good grade but it will be all from LUCK

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support

  • it was as if we were teaching each other
  • impossible to reach
  • I received more emails from classmates than from him

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Eight mostly older reviews are directionally consistent on weak teaching, but detail quality varies and two have no comments.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

PHIL012 reviews
PHILO12 reviews
PHIL11 review
PHIL28321 review
PHILO0011 review
Show 1 more courses
PHILO16421 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values