AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Melody Nightingale

ESL11 · ESL2029 · ESL11B · ESL16 · ESL11AB · ESL16BESL11A · ESL2068 · 11B · 21A · ESL11A · ESL · ESL21A · ESL21 · ESL1382 · ESL16B · ESL16C · 11A · ESL2110 · ENG21A · GEO2177 · 59 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid this professor; find another ESL instructor if and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedUnresponsiveHarsh GraderHigh Fail RateAvoid Online
  • Majority of and often ignores emails and questions.
  • Many report unclear , and high fail rates.
  • A minority of older reviews call her sweet or helpful, but overall tone is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Students repeatedly say you will not get an A, many fail, and .

Both online and ; most detail comes from in-person classes.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Content can look easy, but , and inconsistent teaching make the real experience hard.

In-person comments dominate; online notes also call the class difficult and poorly run.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

and lateness is policed; others say it was not required, with little consistent policy detail.

Evidence is thin overall; a few in-person and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

and most comments urge students to stay away.

Online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students report high fail rates, impossible As, and .

Format shift

person.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Assignments can seem light, but and late posts create stress more than volume alone.

Format shift

Workload complaints are mainly in-person; online pain is more about silence and chaos.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Frequent themes , and little learning support.

Format shift

Online is especially weak; positives.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Quizzes and and often feel trickier than classwork or the textbook.

Format shift

Exam and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and many fails, with only scattered older praise.

Main concern

, and weak communication.

What students said

“She is very disorganized, most of the time she didn't answer your question even send her an .”
ESL16C
“The . Very unorganized and had favorites. .”
ESL
“ !!!! You will get FAIL! More than 50% OF STUDENTS got fail in my class.”
ESL21A

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe the worst online ESL experience: , and .

Main concern

Zero support and poor online organization make the class feel unworkable.

What students said

“ . I would not suggest you to take her class.”
ESL16B
“WORST ESL PROFESSOR”
GEO2177

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and can be much harder than assignments, with grading rules that students say shift late.

Unclear Quiz DirectionsTricky QuizzesGrade Scale Changes After FinalNot Textbook-Based Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students report quizzes , and score distribution changed after the final.

Unclear Quiz DirectionsTricky QuizzesPost-Final Grade Changes
“gives ridiculously easy assignments and after that never corrects).”
ESL16C
“ . Also, she changes score distribution from syllabus after FAINAL EXAM.”
ESL21A

Online

Online reviews ; they mainly call the course disorganized and unhelpful.

Disorganized Online Course
“I took her ESL16B online class and that was the .”
ESL16B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“For all of you who are really want to learn something during your time in SMC. . She is the worst ESL professor I ever had in my life.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting organization, grading, and communication themes. Credibility rating: High.

🚫

12/100

“Avoid! Avoid! Avoid! Terrible professor”

📉 Harsh and

18/100

“ !!!! You will get FAIL! More than 50% OF STUDENTS got fail in my class.”

📭 Unresponsive Teaching

24/100

“Never answers emails, does not put ”

🧩

24/100

“She is very disorganized, most of the time she didn't answer your question even send her an .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Quality

  • She is the worst ESL professor I ever had in my life.
  • Absolutely useless class, complete waste of time and money.
  • She shouldn't be teaching online classes!! I didn't learn anything from her.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • You never gonna have an A.
  • More than 50% got fail.
  • Dont even think about getting A or even B even in online classes!

Theme 3

✉️ About Communication

  • and questions I asked
  • on time.
  • I ask a question and get no response.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

59

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years show a consistent negative core on organization, response time, and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 57
1 out of 529

Course coverage

ESL11A11 reviews
ESL21A7 reviews
ESL16C4 reviews
21A3 reviews
ESL3 reviews
Show 15 more courses
ESL11B3 reviews
ESL163 reviews
ESL16B3 reviews
11B2 reviews
11A1 review
ENG21A1 review
ESL111 review
ESL11AB1 review
ESL13821 review
ESL16BESL11A1 review
ESL20291 review
ESL20681 review
ESL211 review
ESL21101 review
GEO21771 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values