AI Rate Professor

Music

Drew Holt

MUSIC32 · MUSIC32ONLINE · MUSIC2688 · MUS1 · MUSIC1 · MUSIC32ON · MUSICAPPREC · ONLINEMUSIC32 · MUSICAPP · MUSIC · MUS32ONLINE · ONLINEMA32 · MUS32 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Worth it for Music 1 or appreciation if you stay consistent; expect more grind online.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and helpfulLots of quizzesClear grading criteriaOnline heavy workloadMusic theory pace varies
  • , and willing to help students succeed
  • Online music classes bring many quizzes and more busywork
  • A is doable if you keep up, but non-musicians may struggle in theory-heavy sections

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Many say an A is no problem if you do all work; and theory can demand real study.

Online review says fairly easy; and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content ranges from super easy appreciation to tough theory for non-musicians.

Online appreciation feels easier; in-person Music 1 can feel math-like and fast.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

and missing class hurts grades.

Mostly from in-person Music 1; online .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Strong recent praise and 100% would-take-again where given, tempered by older harsh outliers and .

; some course-structure complaints appear in older notes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

, and understanding when students ask for help.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Lots of quizzes, concert reports, and written analysis especially online; not always hard but frequent.

Format shift

Online and online-setup comments stress daily .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Many call him funny, clear, and caring; a .

Format shift

Recent in-person and online notes are warmer than a few early 2000s critiques.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Mix of frequent quizzes, concert report, midterms/finals, and written music analysis.

Format shift

Online emphasizes timed tests and many quizzes; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Mostly positive for ; mixed on theory difficulty and older online-course setup complaints mislabeled as in-person flags.

Main concern

Music fundamentals can overwhelm non-musicians; some find teaching uneven.

What students said

“He teaches what is going , and will assist any student that might have a hard time grasping the material.”
MUSIC1
“If and don't missing the class hours you will get the A on this class.”
MUSIC1
“GREAT, EASY and INTERESTING CLASS!!! .”
MUSIC32

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

interesting, fairly easy if material is familiar.

Main concern

.

What students said

“The online course was really interesting, and fairly easy to do well on. , so even with notes, you should get familiar with material.”
MUS32

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Standard music exams and quizzes; online timed tests allow notes if you know material.

Timed testsNotes often usableMany quizzesConcert report

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Teaches to the test thoroughly; quizzes and concert reports common; no Lockdown Browser mentioned.

Teaches to the testQuizzesConcert report
“He teaches what is going ”
MUSIC1

Online

Timed tests; notes allowed but familiarity still needed.

Timed testsNotes allowed
“ , so even with notes, you should get familiar with material.”
MUS32

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof. Holt as a teacher is interested in seeing his students succeed. He teaches what is going ”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 , and grade attainability. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“He is great professor,very funny and he helps you a lot if you need help.”

📚 Workload Reality

48/100

“Lots of .”

👍 Recommendation

78/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Caring
  • always ready to help

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • getting A is no problem as long as u do everything assigned
  • music its like math,pretty tough class
  • Super Easy if you just follow along

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • fairly easy to do well on
  • log-on almost everyday in
  • CD costs like $100

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

27 reviews from 2002-2016 with mixed but majority-positive themes and enough detail on workload and help style.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 57
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MUSIC110 reviews
MUSIC325 reviews
MUS322 reviews
MUS11 review
MUS32ONLINE1 review
Show 8 more courses
MUSIC1 review
MUSIC26881 review
MUSIC32ON1 review
MUSIC32ONLINE1 review
MUSICAPP1 review
MUSICAPPREC1 review
ONLINEMA321 review
ONLINEMUSIC321 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1