AI Rate Professor

Biological Sciences

Andrea Ackerson

NUTR1 · NUTRITION1 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you will attend, do the homework, and put real study time into the science content.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing LecturesClear Grading CriteriaScience-Heavy NutritionShow Up and ParticipateStrict When Needed
  • Most students love her passion, kindness, and and exams.
  • Nutrition content is science-heavy and doable with steady study of slides and homework.
  • Attendance and participation matter; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

Many call exams and lectures manageable with study, but science weight and .

; no online reviews available.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

, yet nutrition science depth and mixed difficulty ratings keep it standard.

; no online reviews available.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Tags and comments say skip class and you will not pass; as required for success.

; no online reviews available.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Three strong raves call her amazing and great; one critical review still rates quality 4, so overall recommendation stays high.

; no online reviews available.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

and fair outcomes for diligent students, though .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Homework, slide quizzes, exams at 120 points, and a 150-point final require steady weekly effort.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students highlight smart, passionate lectures, kindness, and strong subject mastery with mostly glowing quality scores.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

and final dominate the grade more than pure projects.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person nutrition courses pair passionate lectures and and weighted exams; most praise her, one flags strict grading.

Main concern

Skipping class or underestimating science content can tank the grade; .

What students said

“Show up, participate and do the homework and you will get a good grade. Loved her!!!”
NUTRITION1
“Very doable course if you dedicate some time. this class involves more science, so don't expect it to be easy if you hate science.”
NUTR1
“She made the .”
6006

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes follow slides and ; format is standard rather than open-book friendly.

Slide-Based QuizzesWeighted ExamsHigh-Point Final

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person quizzes are slide-based and closed-class expectations.

Quizzes From SlidesExams 120 PointsFinal 150 Points
“Exams are worth 120 points and the final is worth 150. Her schedule is straightforward and the .”
NUTR1
“Easy lectures and tests, and ”
NUTR1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Ackerson is amazing. She is very smart and passionate about nutrition and it shows in her lectures.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting lecture quality, science workload, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Overall she's a great professor and knows what she's talking about.”

📈 Effort For Grade

60/100

“Show up, participate and do the homework and you will get a good grade.”

⚖️

52/100

“She made the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and willing to help any student who asks for it.
  • she is an amazing professor. Easy lectures and tests
  • Amazing lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very doable course if you dedicate some time.
  • this class involves more science, so don't expect it to be easy if you hate science.
  • She made the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

Four in-person reviews from 2015-2016 are mostly detailed and positive, with .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NUTR12 reviews
60061 review
NUTRITION11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values