AI Rate Professor

Physical Sciences

Amy Thompson

PHYS14 · PHYS6 · PHYSCS14 · PHYSICS14 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you will show up, study for , and use office hours.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and approachablePatient office hoursExam-heavy physicsHands-on lecturesClear expectations
  • Students love her care, patience, and office-hour help
  • Physics is still hard and
  • Attend and study hard and an A is realistic

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

An A is available if you put in real study work for .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Physics content is challenging but she makes it learnable with .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Most students report and say lectures matter for tests.

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Nearly every review calls her a .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grades of A and B appear when students put in the work; not a .

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Workload

Light

65/100

; effort is concentrated on studying for exams.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

, and highly approachable with strong office-hour support.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Success hinges on cumulative exams and .

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Consistently praised for care and clarity in conceptual physics; long hands-on lectures and .

Main concern

and need to study hard for cumulative tests.

What students said

“Physics is hard but possible with her.”
PHYSICS14
“No HW, but you really need to study for this course cause everything .”
PHYSCS14
“Prof. Thompson encouraged me to come to office hours and was patient and .”
PHYS14

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are cumulative and explanation-based; study hard and do not leave blanks.

Cumulative examsExplanation-based testsIn-person examsStudy-heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; lectures and practice matter.

Cumulative examsExplanation on testsNever leave questions blank
“ , so you need to work hard, and never leave questions blank!”
PHYSCS14
“Lectures are long, but very important for the test. You need to go to class and participate.”
PHYSICS14

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Physics is hard but possible with her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 , and effort. Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Care For Students

92/100

“She shows she cares about her students everyday.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“one of the so much from her”

📈 Effort For An A

45/100

“if you want an A just be ready to put in the work and you will do well”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a great professor caring, and so understanding
  • Lectures are interesting, lots of hands on activities
  • very approachable and easy to talk to

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Physics is hard but possible with her
  • No HW, but you really need to study for this course
  • if you want an A just be ready to put in the work

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She got your back!
  • was patient and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seven consistent, detailed 2015-2016 reviews with matching praise and grade patterns.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHYSICS143 reviews
PHYS62 reviews
PHYS141 review
PHYSCS141 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values