AI Rate Professor

Biological Sciences

ML Stephanou

PHYS3 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Skip if and slides; only consider if you can self-teach PHYS3 heavily.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesNo SlidesDisorganizedOld-School Board WorkPolarizing
  • Recent students call lectures confusing, slow, and .
  • while many feel the .
  • One older glowing A+ review conflicts with later low quality and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

One A+ appears, but and the need to self-supplement, so an A still costs real effort.

All evidence is from in-person PHYS3 reviews; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Difficulty ratings and comments about confusing board lectures and and delivery challenge.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Two reviews explicitly mark attendance mandatory with no flexibility described.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Would-take-again is 0% in provided stats and the two .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Limited grade detail beyond one A+; , but no free A either.

Format shift

and only in-person.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Students stress self-supplementation and .

Format shift

Workload comments are all in-person.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Recent students report and little usable structure.

Format shift

Teaching quality claims are mixed across years but .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Students mention exams and study guides but .

Format shift

Assessment detail is thin and only in-person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person PHYS3 feedback is split: and zero take-again interest, while one older review praises passion and a strong study guide.

Main concern

and harsh responses when students ask for .

What students said

“Her lectures are so confusing. She doesn't use PowerPoint, she just scribbles on the board”
PHYS3
“She's slow and boring. Not sure where she is lecturing from. so we can follow along.”
PHYS3
“ !!! SMC is lucky to have her! shes a nice person and is passionate about science”
PHYS3

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring policy; students mainly complain that .

In-Person CourseStudy Guide MentionedExam Clarity Concerns

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a useful study guide in one review, but also frustration when asking what is on the exam.

Study GuideUnclear Exam Expectations
“when you ask her to clarify what's on the asking”
PHYS3
“she teaches with passion and provides an extremely useful study guide”
PHYS3

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her lectures are so confusing. She doesn't use PowerPoint, she just scribbles on the board and then when you ask her to clarify what's on the asking.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews spanning 2014-2016, highlighting conflict between older praise and newer confusion. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Clarity

34/100

“Her lectures are so confusing. She doesn't use PowerPoint, she just scribbles on the board”

🚫

22/100

“Get ready to supplement for this class.”

🌟 Older Positive Outlier

90/100

“ !!! SMC is lucky to have her! shes a nice person and is passionate about science”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are so confusing. She doesn't use PowerPoint, she just scribbles on the board
  • She's slow and boring. Not sure where she is lecturing from.
  • so we can follow along.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Support

  • Get ready to supplement for this class.
  • she provides an extremely useful study guide
  • I learned more than I .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

and limited grade or policy detail reduce confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHYS33 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values