AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Ariane Dalla Dea

ANTHRO2 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can attend every class and ; expect mixed teaching quality and an average experience.

Best fit · Effort For RewardSweet but UnevenAttendance MandatoryAccent BarrierMixed OutcomesBoring Lectures
  • Only three old in-person reviews with sharply split grades (A vs F) and quality scores.
  • and notes matter for quizzes and tests.
  • Some call her sweet and easy if you participate; others call lectures boring and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

One student earned an A by attending and doing work, but another failed and and odd tests.

All evidence is from in-person ANTHRO2 reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content can feel easy with participation, , and raise the challenge.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and notes from class feed quizzes and tests.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

One strong recommend contrasts with average-to-poor comments about boredom, accent, and weak teaching.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Grades range from A to F with little proof of a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Expect , and tests rather than an overwhelming load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Students split between sweet knowledgeable lectures and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Quizzes and and film-based discussion.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person ANTHRO2 is attendance-heavy with interesting films for some and boring, hard-to-follow lectures for others.

Main concern

Accent, unorganized lectures, and a if .

What students said

“She's a very sweet knowledgeable professor. .”
ANTHRO2
“Boring lectures and .”
ANTHRO2
“Not the ”
ANTHRO2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and tests reward class notes; one review flags a .

In-Person QuizzesIn-Person TestsNotes RequiredStrange Test Format

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and ; format described as strange by one student.

In-Person QuizzesIn-Person TestsNotes RequiredStrange Test Format
“write down all the notes because you will need them for your quizzes and tests”
ANTHRO2
“ ”
ANTHRO2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's a very sweet knowledgeable professor. . Make sure you attend each class and write down all the notes because you will need them for your quizzes and tests.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews spanning 2015-2016, highlighting mixed teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“An average professor. I have taken Anthropology in the past and other professors make it much more interesting.”

👍 Recommendation Split

42/100

“Not the ”

📝 Attendance and Notes

18/100

“Make sure you attend each class and write down all the notes because you will need them for your quizzes and tests.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's a very sweet knowledgeable professor.
  • Boring lectures and .
  • Sometimes it is hard to understand her because of the accent.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • The class is very easy as long as you participate and do your work.
  • You will need to read 2 whole books during the semester.
  • Not the

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She's a very sweet knowledgeable professor.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews from 2015-2016 with conflicting grades and thin detail limit confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ANTHRO23 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values